ac

Students' Attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in English Speaking Intensive Program

Authors

  • Rizky Vita Losi Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Muhammad Muslim Nasution University of Medan Area, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

10.47709/ijeal.v2i1.1428

Keywords:

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Language Attitude, English Speaking Intensive Program

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

University students had difficulty with communicative skills, and they must engage in discussion situations in EFL class without adequate skills to speak or write in English. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) can play an essential role in EFL classes. This study surveyed the students’ attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in an English-speaking intensive program. Fifteen university students responded to a 20-statement questionnaire as the data. The data was analyzed by using SPSS 20.0 program. The research findings revealed that the students showed positive attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). The students’ felt excited about learning through communicative activities, such as pair and group work, role play, games, etc. This learning satisfaction impacted their willingness to communicate in English. They were also motivated to communicate in English in their class even though they found it was not easy to use CLT, but they kept practising independently. Furthermore, it can be concluded that learning through CLT enabled students to communicate meaningfully, and their attitudes about these communication activities were positively impacted

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 1275 times

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2022-03-23
Accepted Date: 2022-03-23
Published Date: 2022-04-01

How to Cite

Rizky Vita Losi, & Muslim Nasution, M. . (2022). Students’ Attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in English Speaking Intensive Program. International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL), 2(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijeal.v2i1.1428