PUBLICATION ETHICS

To maintain the quality of manuscripts and avoid publishing violations/plagiarism in the publishing process, the editorial board stipulates scientific publication ethics Journal of International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics (IJEAL). This publication ethics rule applies to authors/authors, editors, bestari/reviewer partners, and journal/editor managers. The publication ethic refers to the provisions of scientific publication ethics set by COPE (Committee on Publications Ethics) standards.

Author Ethics

  1. Reporting; The author must provide information about the process and results of his research to the editors in an honest, transparent and thorough manner and keep his research data appropriately and safely stored.
  2. Originality and plagiarism; the author must ensure that the manuscript sent/submitted to the editor is an original manuscript, written by himself, sourced from his ideas and ideas, and not plagiarizing other people's writings or ideas/ideas. Authors are strictly prohibited from changing the names of sources cited to other people's names.
  3. Delivery repetition; The author must inform that the manuscript sent/submitted to the editor is a manuscript that has never been submitted/submitted to another journal/publication publisher. If redundancy is found in sending manuscripts to other publishers, the editor will reject the manuscript sent by the author.
  4. Author status; the author must inform the editor that the writer has the competence or qualifications in a particular field of expertise, that is, the field of published science, namely librarianship. The author who sends the manuscript to the editor is the first author (co-author) so that if problems are found in publishing the manuscript, they can be resolved immediately.
  5. Script writing errors; The author must immediately inform the editor if a mistake is found in the manuscript, both the review results and the edits. These writing errors include writing names, affiliations/agencies, quotations, and other writings that can reduce the meaning and substance of the manuscript. If that happens, the author must immediately propose improvements to the manuscript.
  6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the author must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that manuscripts can be processed smoothly and safely.
  7. Manuscript Withdrawal; Authors are not allowed to withdraw manuscripts sent to IJEAL. This is because the withdrawal of the manuscript could have been better spent a lot of time, effort and process sent to the publisher.
  8. Manuscript Revocation. Manuscripts that have been published at IJEAL will be considered based on the Editorial Board's decision if they meet the provisions for violations of scientific publication, including (a) There is clear evidence of data falsification, (b) There is clear evidence that the manuscript has been previously published on other publishers, (c) There is clear evidence of plagiarism, taking other people's writings and so on from other people which makes it appear as if the work is his. (d) Research that violates norms and ethics. Revocation of the manuscript will issue a Corrigendum

Editorial Ethics

Publication decision; the editor must ensure that the manuscript review process is thorough, transparent, objective, fair, and thoughtful. This becomes the editor's basis in deciding whether a manuscript is rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board acts as a manuscript selection team.

  1. Publication information; The editor must ensure that guidelines for writing manuscripts for authors and other interested parties can be accessed and read clearly in print and electronic versions.
  2. Distribution of peer-reviewed manuscripts; the editor must ensure the reviewer and the manuscript material for review, as well as inform the provisions and process for reviewing the manuscript to the reviewer.
  3. Objectivity and neutrality; Editors must be objective, neutral and honest in editing manuscripts, regardless of gender, the business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group and nationality of the author.
  4. Confidentiality; the editor must take good care of any information, especially related to the author's privacy and the manuscript's distribution.
  5. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; the editor must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.

Reviewer Ethics

  1. Objectivity and neutrality; reviewers, must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only side with scientific truth. The manuscript is reviewed professionally without distinguishing gender, the business side, ethnicity, religion, race, inter-group, and the author's nationality.
  2. Clarity of reference sources; the reviewer must ensure that the source of references/quotes from the manuscript is appropriate and credible (accountable). Suppose an error or deviation is found in writing a reference/citation source. In that case, the reviewer must immediately inform the editor of corrections to be made by the author according to the notes from the reviewer.
  3. Peer-reviewed effectiveness; the reviewer must respond to the manuscript sent by the editor and work according to the established peer-review time (maximum 2 weeks). If you need additional time to review the manuscript, you must immediately report (confirm) to the editorial secretariat.
  4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; reviewers must understand the ethics of scientific publication above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.

Journal Management Ethics

  1. Decision-making; the journal manager/editor's board must describe the mission and goals of the organization, especially those relating to the establishment of policies and decisions to publish journals without any particular interest.
  2. Freedom; Journal managers must give liberty to reviewers and editors to create a comfortable working atmosphere and respect the privacy of authors.
  3. Guarantees and promotions; Journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright) and be transparent in managing funds received by third parties. In addition, journal managers must publish and promote published results to the public by guaranteeing the benefits of using the manuscript.
  4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest; Journal managers must understand the ethics of scientific publications above to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.