Manajemen Portofolio Proyek Berkelanjutan – Sebuah Desain Pendekatan Penelitian Sains

Authors

  • Ken Sabardiman Soetjipto Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Bina Sarana Global
  • Sri Rahayu Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Bina Sarana Global
  • Afrizal Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Bina Sarana Global
  • Ahmad Arifin Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Bina Sarana Global
  • Moh Rizqy Umar Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Bina Sarana Global

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47709/jebma.v6i2.8339

Keywords:

analitik, manajemen portofolio proyek berkelanjutan, materialitas proyek, penelitian ilmu desain, standar pengungkapan keberlanjutan

Abstract

Latar belakang: penelitian ini mengikuti pendekatan Riset Ilmu Desain (Design Science Research/DSR) untuk membahas integrasi keberlanjutan ke dalam Manajemen Portofolio Proyek (Project Portfolio Management/PPM). Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi tantangan utama dalam manajemen proyek berkelanjutan dan bagaimana metodologi DSR memandu desain, pengembangan, dan evaluasi berulang dari sebuah artefak yang mengintegrasikan keberlanjutan dalam konteks PPM. Metode: kerangka kerja Manajemen Portofolio Proyek Berkelanjutan (Sustainable Project Portfolio Management/SPPM) yang diusulkan dibangun berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip keberlanjutan Triple Bottom Line (TBL), menggabungkan Penilaian Materialitas Proyek dan alat pengambilan keputusan berbasis data untuk memastikan bahwa ketiga dimensi keberlanjutan (ekonomi, sosial, dan lingkungan) sepenuhnya tertanam dalam proses pemilihan dan manajemen proyek. Penelitian ini menyajikan desain dan pengembangan artefak, diikuti oleh evaluasi yang ketat untuk menilai efektivitas dalam mencapai hasil proyek yang didorong oleh keberlanjutan. Hasil: temuan menunjukkan bahwa mengintegrasikan keberlanjutan dalam PPM melalui kerangka kerja SPPM memberikan keselarasan strategis, pengambilan keputusan yang lebih baik, dan kepatuhan yang lebih besar terhadap tujuan keberlanjutan. Pengetahuan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini, bersama dengan keterbatasan yang diidentifikasi, peletakan dasar untuk penyempurnaan lebih lanjut dari artefak SPPM. Kesimpulan: penelitian ini menguraikan kontribusi artefak SPPM terhadap praktik manajemen proyek berkelanjutan.

References

Aldea, A., Iacob, M.-E., Daneva, M., & Helmy Masyhur, L. (2019). Multi-Criteria and Model-Based Analysis for Project Selection: An Integration of Capability-Based Planning, Project Portfolio Management and Enterprise Architecture. IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2019.00032

APM Portfolio Management SIG. (2019). Portfolio Management - A Practical Guide (1st ed.). APM.

Avdiji, H., & Winter, R. (2019). Knowledge Gaps in Design Science Research. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), 1–17.

Barghi, B., & Shadrokh Sikari, S. (2020). Qualitative and quantitative project risk assessment using a hybrid PMBOK model developed under uncertainty conditions. Heliyon, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03097

Baskerville, R.L., Kaul, M., & Storey, V.C. (2015). Genres of Inquiry in Design-Science. Research. Quarterly, 39(3), 541–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/26629620

Blak Bernat, G., Qualharini, E.L., & Castro, M.S. (2023). Enhancing Sustainability in Project Management: The Role of Stakeholder Engagement and Knowledge Management in Virtual Team Environments. Sustainability, 15(6), 4896. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064896

Cadenasso, M.L., & Pickett, S.T.A. (2018). Situating sustainability from an ecological science perspective. In J. Sze (Ed.), Sustainability: Approaches to Environmental Justice and Social Power (pp. 29–52). New York University Press.

Carbon Disclosure Project. (2023). Carbon Disclosure Project. Cdp. Net. https://www.cdp.net/en/info/about-us

Clegg, S., Killen, C.P., Biesenthal, C., & Sankaran, S. (2018). Practices, projects and portfolios: Current research trends and new directions. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 762–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.008

Cooper, R., Edgett, S., & Kleinschmidt, E. (2001). Portfolio Management for New Product Development: Results of an Industry Practices Study. R and D Management, 31(4), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00225

Courtnell, J. (2019). GRI Standards for Sustainability Reporting: What They Are and Why They Matter. Process Street. https://www.process.st/gri-standards/

Craddock, A., Roberts, B., Stapleton, J., & Godwin, J. (Eds.). (2017). Project Management through the Lifecycle. In AgilePM Agile Project Management Handbook v2 (pp. 94–100). Agile Business Consortium Limited.

Doorasamy, M. (2017). Product Portfolio Management Best Practices for New Product Development: A Review of Models. Foundations of Management, 9, 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2017 0011

Dumay, J., Guthrie, J., & Farneti, F. (2010). GRI sustainability reporting guidelines for public and third sector organizations: A critical review. Public Management Review, 12(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.496266

Dursun, M., Goker, N., & Mutlu, H. (2022). Evaluation of Project Management Methodologies Success Factors Using Fuzzy Cognitive Map Method: Waterfall, Agile, And Lean Six Sigma Cases. 51 Javed Mohammad, Laden Husamaldin Original Research Paper. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications in Engineering IJISAE, 10(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1039/b000000x

Ferraro, E., & Reid, L. (2013). On sustainability and materiality. Homo faber, a new approach. Ecological Economics, 96, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.003

Gachie, W. (2019). Project sustainability management: risks, problems and perspective. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(1), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.27

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). A Short introduction to the GRI Standards. In GRI Standards. Global Reporting Initiative. www.globalreporting.org

Global Sustainability Standards Board. (2020). Consolidated Set of GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards 2020. Global Sustainability Standards Board. https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/

Gregor, S., & Hevner, A.R. (2013). Positioning and Presenting Design Science Research for Maximum Impact. In Source: MIS Quarterly (Vol. 37, Issue 2).

Gregor, S., & Zwikael, O. (2024). Design science research and the co-creation of project management knowledge. International Journal of Project Management, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102584

Hanafizadeh, P., & Ashhari, R. (2025). A taxonomy for data-driven business models. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 20(1), 60–100.

Hartwig, S., & Mathews, S. (2020). Innovation Project Risk Analytics: A Preliminary Finding: Use risk analytics for new product development for high-risk innovation projects. Research Technology Management, 63(3), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2020.1733901

Huemann, M., & Silvius, G. (2017). Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development. In International Journal of Project Management (Vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 1066–1070). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014

Jørgensen, S., Mjøs, A., & Pedersen, L.J.T. (2022). Sustainability reporting and approaches to materiality: tensions and potential resolutions. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(2), 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2021-0009

Kuzemko, C., & Britton, J. (2020). Policy, politics and materiality across scales: A framework for understanding local government sustainable energy capacity applied in England. Energy Research and Social Science, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101367

Lai, A., & Stacchezzini, R. (2021). Organisational and professional challenges amid the evolution of sustainability reporting: a theoretical framework and an agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2021-1199

Luk, J.W., Pruitt, L.D., Smolenski, D.J., Tucker, J., Workman, D.E., & Belsher, B.E. (2021). From everyday life predictions to suicide prevention: Clinical and ethical considerations in suicide predictive analytic tools. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23202

Marques, G., Gourc, D., & Lauras, M. (2011). Multi-criteria performance analysis for decision making in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1057–1069. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.10.002

Martinsuo, M., & Geraldi, J. (2020). Management of project portfolios: Relationships of project portfolios with their contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 38(7), 441–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.02.002

Meredith, J.R., Mantel, S.J., & Shafer, S.M. (2016). Conflict and the project lifecycle. In Project Management: A Managerial Approach (9th ed., pp. 117–118). John Wiley & Sons.

Moustafaev, J. (2017a). Introduction to Project Portfolio Management. In Project Portfolio Management in Theory and Practice (1st ed., pp. 3–19). CRC Press. 52

Moustafaev, J. (2017b). Project Portfolio Management in Theory and Practice (1st ed.). CRC Press. Int. Journal of Business Science and Applied Management / Business-and-Management.org

Moustafaev, J. (2017c). The Three Pillars of Project Portfolio Management. In Project Portfolio Management in Theory and Practice (1st ed., pp. 21–47). CRC Press.

Moutinho, J. da A., Fernandes, G., & Rabechini, R. (2024). Evaluation in design science: A framework to support project studies in the context of University Research Centres. Evaluation and Program Planning, 102. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102366

Narazaki, R.S., Silveira Chaves, M., & Drebes Pedron, C. (2020). A project knowledge management framework grounded in design science research. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 197–210. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1627

Nayebi, M., Ruhe, G., Mota, R.C., & Mufti, M. (2015). Analytics for software project management - Where are we and where do we go? 30th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops, ASEW 2015, 18–21. DOI: 10.1109/ASEW.2015.28

Owen, C.L. (1997). Understanding Research Science. Toward an Achievement of Balance. Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 5(2), 36–45.

Papadopoulos, T., & Balta, M.E. (2022). Climate Change and big data analytics: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Information Management, 63. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102448

Patanakul, P. (2022). How to Achieve Effectiveness in Project Portfolio Management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(4), 987–999. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2020.2964316

Peddada, K., & Sharma, T.K. (2020). Project Risk Management Using Analytical Hierarchy Process?: Illustrative Case Study. Abhigyan, XXXVIII(1), 40–50.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)-and The Standard for Project Management. (7th ed.).

Risso, D. (2022). Integrating Sustainability into an Organisation: A Project, Program, and Portfolio Management Approach. Politecnico Di Torino.

Sardianou, E., Stauropoulou, A., Evangelinos, K., & Nikolaou, I. (2021). A materiality analysis framework to assess sustainable development goals of banking sector through sustainability reports. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1775–1793. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.020

Schoormann, T., Stadtländer, M., & Knackstedt, R. (2022). Designing business model development tools for sustainability a design science study. Electronic Markets, 32(2), 645–667. DOI: 10.1007/s12525-021-00466-3

Sharda, R. (2018). Business intelligence, analytics, and data science?: a managerial perspective (4th Edition). Pearson. Silvius, G. (2017). Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1479–1493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121

Silvius, G. (2021). The role of the project management office in sustainable project management. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 1066–1076. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.302

Silvius, G., & Marnewick, C. (2022). Interlinking Sustainability in Organizational Strategy, Project Portfolio Management and Project Management A Conceptual Framework. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 938–947. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.095

Singh Dara Singh, K., Abbasi BSB, M.A., Ali Abbasi, G., Amran, A., & Ries Ahmed, E. (2021). Contemporary CSR Model: Conceptualization, Scale Development, and Validation to Measure Consumer Perceptions. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 16(3), 63–87.

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (2023). About Us - SASB. Sasb. Org. https://www.sasb.org/about/

To, C.K.M., & Chau, K.P. (2022). Characterizing sustainability materiality: ESG materiality determination in technology venturing. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 1(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.stae.2022.100024 53

Tuunanen, T., Winter, R., & vom Brocke, J. (2024). Dealing with complexity in Design Science Research: A methodology using design echelons. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 48(2), 427–458. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2023/16700

Vaishnavi, V.K., & Kuechler, W. (2015). Design Science Research Methods and Patterns Innovating Information and Communication Technology (2nd ed.). CRC Press.

Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2015). Introduction to Design Science Research in Information and Communication Technology. In Design science research methods and patterns?: innovating information and communication technology (Second, p. 11). CRC Press.

van Tulder, R., Francken, M., da Rosa, A., & van Tilburg, R. (2014). Managing the Transition to a Sustainable Enterprise Lessons from Frontrunner Companies. In Routledge. Routledge.

Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., & Baskerville, R. (2016). FEDS: A Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. In European Journal of Information Systems (Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 77–89). Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2014.36

vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A., & Maedche, A. (2020). Introduction to Design Science Research (pp. 1 13). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_1

Wagner, R., Huemann, M., & Radujkovic, M. (2021). The influence of project management associations on projectification of society – An institutional perspective. Project Leadership and Society, 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.plas.2021.100021

Wu, S.R., Shao, C., & Chen, J. (2018). Approaches on the screening methods for materiality in sustainability reporting. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 10, Issue 9). MDPI. DOI: 10.3390/su10093233

Yu, M., Zhu, F., Yang, X., Wang, L., & Sun, X. (2018). Integrating Sustainability into Construction Engineering Projects: Perspective of Sustainable Project Planning. Sustainability, 10(784). DOI: 10.3390/su1003078

Downloads

Published

2026-05-11

How to Cite

Soetjipto, K. S., Rahayu, S., Afrizal, Arifin, A., & Umar, M. R. (2026). Manajemen Portofolio Proyek Berkelanjutan – Sebuah Desain Pendekatan Penelitian Sains. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi (Jebma), 6(2), 449 – 463. https://doi.org/10.47709/jebma.v6i2.8339

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.