|Aim & Scope|
|Open Access Policy|
|Call for Reviewer|
|Copyright and License|
The journal will consider primary research papers from any source if they make an original contribution to the experimental or theoretical understanding and application of theories and methodologies of some aspects of agricultural science including:
The editor first evaluates all manuscripts. It is rare, but it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to at least 2 experts for review.
Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt.
This journal employs a single-blind review, where the reviewer remains anonymous throughout the process/ double-blind reviewing, where both the reviewer and author remain anonymous throughout the process / open reviewing were both the reviewer and author are known to one another.
Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript :
Reviewers are not expected to correct or copy edit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer-review process.
Typically the manuscript will be reviewed within one months or more. Should the reviewers’ reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed a further expert opinion will be sought. All our reviewers sign a conflict of interest statement. Revised manuscripts are usually returned to the initial referees within 2 weeks. Reviewers may request more than one revision of a manuscript.
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.
If you are not currently a reviewer for the Journal of Agriculture (JoA) but would like to be added to the list of reviewers for this title, please contact the editorial office at email@example.com. The benefits of reviewing for Journal of Agriculture (JoA)g include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in an annual statement inJournal of Agriculture (JoA) if you have reviewed more than X manuscripts in the preceding 12 months. You may also be able to cite your work for the Journal of Agriculture (JoA) as part of your professional development requirements for various professional societies and organizations.
Office: Jl. Sugeng, Komplek. Griya Makmur 7. No. D29. Deli Serdang. Sumatera Utara.
Journal of Agriculture (JoA) Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).