ac

Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Dalam Memilih Sekolah MTs

Authors

  • Reza Hadim Adiwiguna Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Ma'mun Sarma Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Jono Mintarto Munandar Institut Pertanian Bogor

DOI:

10.47709/jebma.v4i2.3889

Keywords:

minat; keputusan; sekolah

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh status sosial ekonomi, atribut pribadi, lingkungan dan fasilitas, kelompok referensi dan faktor akademik terhadap keputusan orang tua siswa dalam memilih sekolah MTs Al-Arifin Rahuning. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah seluruh orang tua siswa yang bersekolah di MTs Al-Arifin Rahuning. Jumlah siswa yang bersekolah di MTs Al-Arifin Rahuning adalah 101 siswa. Data diolah dan dianalisis menggunakan Metode Structural Equation Model (SEM) digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis dengan menggunakan program Partial Least Squares (PLS) versi 3.0. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa status sosial ekonomi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap keputusan orang tua siswa. Atribut pribadi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap keputusan orang tua siswa memilih Kelompok referensi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap keputusan orang tua siswa dan Lingkungan dan fasilitas tidak berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap keputusan orang tua. Terdapat pengaruh gender dan pendapatan yang memoderasi kelompok referensi terhadap keputusan orang tua siswa memilih

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 200 times

References

Adele OA. 2015. Availability of basic technical learning materials in Biology in selected secondary schools in Lagos State. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria. 41:263 - 266.

Afwa A. 2017. Analisis Faktor Kelompok Referensi Perilaku Konsumen dalam Siswa Memilih Bersekolah Di SMK Ibnu Taimyah Pekanbaru. Jurnal Valuta. 3(2).

Akbar H, Simanjuntak M, Asnawi YH. 2022. Pengaruh Keputusan Pemilihan Pada Sekolah Islam Terpadu Terhadap Kepuasan dan Positive Word of Mouth. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen. 8(2). doi: 10.17358/jabm.8.2.503.

Akpan IF. 2020. The Influence of School Environment on Academic Performance of Biology Students in Secondary Schools in Ukanafun Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State. Social Science Research Network Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3530562.

Aktar S. 2017. Upaya meningkatkan daya saing sekolah melalui pemasaran jasa pendidikan. Kumpulan Jurnal Dosen Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. 2(12).

Baker L. 2012. A History of School Design and its Indoor Environmental Standards, 1900 to Today. Washington DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.

Bapna R, Umyarov A. 2015. Do your online friends make you pay? A randomized field experiment on peer influence in online social networks. Management Science. 61(8):1902-1920. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2081.

Chapman DW. 1981. A Model of Student College Choice. The Journal of Higher Education. 52(5):490-505. doi:10.2307/1981837.

Chazan B. 2022. What Is “Education”?. In: Principles and Pedagogies in Jewish Education. Washington DC .Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Chi Hai N, Thanh NH, Chau TM, Sang TV, Dong VH. 2023. Factors affecting the decision to choose a university of high school students: A study in An Giang Province, Vietnam. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 12(1):535. doi:10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22971.

Colognesi S, Van Nieuwenhoven C, Beausaert S. 2020. Supporting newly-qualified teachers’ professional development and perseverance in secondary education: On the role of informal learning. European Journal of Teacher Education. 43(2):258-276. doi: 10.1080/02619768.2019. 1681963.

Connie G, Senathirajah ARBS, Subramanian P, Ranom R, Osman Z. 2022. Factors Influencing Students' Choice Of An Institution Of Higher Education. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 6(4):10015-10043.

Darwish SA. 2016. The Role of Socioeconomic Factor in Promoting Higher Education in the State of Kuwait. International Education Studies. 9(6):1-14. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n6p1.

Dietrich C. 2010. Decision Making: Factors that Influence Decision Making, Heuristics Used, and Decision Outcomes. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse. Vol 2(02).

DiNapoli J. 2019. Persevering toward What? Investigating the Relationship between Ninth-grade Students’ Achievement Goals and Perseverant Actions on an Algebraic Task. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol 14. No 3.

Efferi A. 2014. Dinamika persaingan antar lembaga pendidikan. Quality Journal Empirical Research In Islamic Education. 2(1). doi: doi:10.21043/quality.v2i1.2095.

Engel FJ, Roger DB, Paul WM. 1994. Perilaku Konsumen, Edisi 6 : jilid 1. Penerbit Binarupa Aksara.

Gabriel MN, Muli NL, Muasya I, Maonga T, Mukhungulu MJ. 2016. Parental socio economic status academic achievement in selected secondary schools in urban informal settlements in Westlands Division, Nairobi county. International Journal of Educations and Social Science. Vol 3. No 1.

Garoufallou E, Rania S, Gerogia Z, Ekaterini B. 2013. The Use of Marketing Concepts in Library Services: a Literature Review. Library Review.

Ghozali I. 2015. Partial Least Squares Konsep, Teknik, dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0. Edisi 2. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Guay F, Burea JS. 2018. Motivation at school: Differentiation between and within school subjects matters in the prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol 54.

Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. European Business Review. 26(2):106-121. doi: 10.1108/EBR10-2013-0128.

Hair JF, Hollingsworth C, Randolph A, Chong A. 2017. An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 117(3).

Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 31(1):2-24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.

Han J, Chu X, Song H, Li Y. 2014. Social Capital, Socioeconomic Status and Self-efficacy. Applied Economics and Finance. Vol 2. No 10.

Hardianti S, Achmadi, Syahrudin H. 2018. The effect of parent's socialeconomic status and economic literacy on the consumption decision of economic educationstudents FKIP Untan. International Journal of Research and Review. Vol 5. No 12.

Haris I. 2012. Determinant factors of decision making process in higher education institution (A Case of State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia). Global Journal of Management and Business Research. Volume 12 Issue 18.

Hermawan D. 2016. A Study on STIKOM Bali’s Student Satisfaction Level in Service Education. International Refereed Research Journal.

Hsu Y, Yuan-fang C. 2013. An analysis of factors affecting parents’ choice of a junior high school. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology.

Khan RMA, Iqbal N, Tasneem S. 2015. The influence of Parents Educational level on Secondary School Students Academic achievements in District Rajanpur. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.6, No.16.

Kirby MM, DiPaola MF. Academic optimism and community engagement in urban schools. Journal of Educational Administration. Vol. 49. No. 5.

Kotler P, Keller KL. 2016. Marketing Management, 15th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Pretice Hall, Inc.

Kotler P, Armstrong G. 2018. Principles of Marketing. 17th Edition. United States : Pearson Education.

Kusumawati A. 2020. Tourism and study abroad options: The use of sources of information by Indonesian postgraduate students to choose an overseas university. Journal of International Students. Vol 10(Special Issue 3).

Lamare T, Myrthong EB. 2020. Socio-Economic Status Its Influence On Academic Interest Of Secondary School Students In Meghalaya: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Education Culture and Society. Vol. 11. No. 2.

Marini A, Safitri D, Nuraini S, Rihatno T, Satibi O, Wahyudi A. 2020. Applying model of mobile web based on character building in teaching learning process to improve student character. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology. Vol 29. No 6.

Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia. 2019. Keputusan Menteri Agama RepublikIndonesia Nomor 184 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Implementasi Kurikulum pada Madrasah. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.

Minh ND, Toan ND. 2020. The new model for teaching collaboration between universities and enterprises: In the case of Vietnam. International Journal of Education and Practice. Vol 8. No 2.

Nam S, Nguyen TT, Oh J. 2019. Performance Indicators Framework for Assessment of a Sanitary Sewer System Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Sustainability. 11(10):2746. doi:10.3390/su11102746.

Padlee SF, Kamaruddin AR, Baharun R. 2010. International Students’ Choice Behaviour for Higher Education at Malaysian Private Universities. International Journal of Marketing Studies. Vol 2. No 2.

Papanis E, Giavrimis P, Vicky A. 2011. Family's influences on youth's educational and professional choices: A review of Greek research. Journal of Regional Socio-Economics & Business. Vol l.

Peter JP, Olson JC. 2009. Consumer Behavior & Marketing. Boston. McGraw-Hill.

Pimpa N, Suwannapirom S. 2008. Thai students’ choices of vocational education: marketing factors and reference groups. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. Vol 7(2).

Ramli A, Zain RM. 2018. The Impact Of Facilities On Student’s Academic Achievement. Science International, Vol. 30 No. 2.

Rorimpandey WH, Maaluas F, Mangangantung J, Suryanto H. 2022. The Student Teams Achievement Divisions Learning Model in Its Influence on the Motivation and Science Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students. Journal of Innovation in Educational

Safaruddin S, Ibrahim N, Juhaeni J, Harmilawati H, Qadrianti L. 2020. The Effect of Project-Based Learning Assisted by Electronic Media on Learning 67 .

Salary S, Holliday L, Keesee M, Wachter H. 2018. Building Features in Schools That Influence Academic Performance. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. Vol 12(3).

Schiffman LG, Kanuk LL. 2010. Consumer Behavior. Edisi ke-12. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Schneider J, Jacobsen R, White RS, Gehlbach H. 2019. The (mis)measure of schools: How data affect stakeholder knowledge and perceptions of quality. Teachers College Record. Vol 120. No 6.

Sekaran U, Bougie R. 2013. Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Edisi ke-6. New York. Wiley.

Seibert SA. 2020. Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. Vol 16(1).

Sharipovna JJ, Oybekovna DG. 2019. Role Of Teachers’ Motivation In Teaching. Scientific Practical Journal. Vol 47(3).

Sivrikaya AH. 2019. The Relationship between Academic Motivation and Academic Achievement of the Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training. Vol 5. No 2.

Soharwardi Ma, Fatima A, Nazir R, Firdous A. 2020. Impact Of Parental Socioeconomic Status On Academic Performance Of Students: A Case Study Of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Journal Of Economics And Economic Education Research. Volume 21, Issue 2.

Sugiyono. 2007. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thomson S. 2018. Achievement at school and socioeconomic background - an educational perspective. npj Science of Learning. Vol 3. No 5.

Torbas OO, & Hloviuk IV, Malakhova OV. 2020. Student Survey For Higher Education Quality Challenges To Design And Analyse Data. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews. Vol 8. No 2.

Verkijika SF. 2018. Factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce applications in Cameroon. Telematics and Informatics. Vol 35(6).

Vincent TV, Kumar MS. 2019. Motivation: Meaning, definition, nature of motivation. International Journal of Yogic. Human Movement and Sports Sciences. Vol 4(1). 68

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2024-05-21
Accepted Date: 2024-05-29
Published Date: 2024-06-09