ac

Investigating the influence of coaches, trainers, and support staff on athletes' decisions to engage in doping practices

Authors

  • Dilawar Pathan Department center of physical education health science and sports University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.

Keywords:

Doping, Motivational Climates, Anti-Doping Education, Moral Disengagement, Athlete Support Personnel, Ethical Leadership, Competitive Sports

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

Doping remains a critical issue in competitive sports, undermining ethical standards and athletes' health. This study investigates the influence of motivational climates, anti-doping education among support personnel, and moral disengagement on athletes' doping susceptibility. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative surveys from 150 athletes and 75 support personnel with qualitative interviews. Quantitative findings revealed that ego-oriented motivational climates significantly increased doping susceptibility, while autonomy-supportive climates reduced it. Additionally, athletes supported by personnel who received anti-doping education demonstrated lower susceptibility to doping. Moral disengagement emerged as a key moderator, with athletes under morally disengaged personnel showing higher doping susceptibility regardless of the motivational climate. Qualitative insights further contextualized these findings, highlighting barriers to fostering autonomy-supportive climates and implementing effective education, including resource constraints and systemic pressures. The study underscores the importance of addressing both psychological and systemic factors to mitigate doping behaviors. These findings align with existing research, emphasizing the need for targeted anti-doping interventions that prioritize education, promote autonomy-supportive environments, and address moral disengagement Policy recommendations include mandatory anti-doping education for all support personnel, tailored interventions to reduce moral disengagement, and organizational reforms to discourage performance-driven pressures. Despite its contributions, the study identifies gaps in understanding systemic factors and the long-term effectiveness of existing interventions, calling for future longitudinal and context-specific research. This research provides valuable insights for advancing clean sport initiatives, offering a pathway to enhance ethical behavior in competitive sports through education, leadership, and systemic change.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 45 times

References

Backhouse, S. H. (2023). A behaviourally informed approach to reducing the risk of inadvertent anti-doping rule violations from supplement use. Sports medicine, 53(Suppl 1), 67-84.

Barkoukis, V., & Elbe, A. M. (2021). Moral behavior and doping. E. Filho & I. Basevitch (Eds.), Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. Research Directions To Advance the Field, 308-322.

Barkoukis, V., Mallia, L., Lazuras, L., Ourda, D., Agnello, S., Andjelkovic, M., ... & Zelli, A. (2022). The role of comprehensive education in anti-doping policy legitimacy and support among clean athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 60, 102173.

Barnes, L. T., Patterson, L. B., & Backhouse, S. H. (2022). A systematic review of research into coach perspectives and behaviours regarding doping and anti-doping. Psychology of sport and exercise, 59, 101780.

BERBECARU, C., VASILE, L., CROITORU, D., & ST?NESCU, M. (2024). STUDY ON COACHES'AND ATHLETES'ATTITUDE TOWARDS THE CONSUMPTION OF DOPING SUBSTANCES. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai, Educatio Artis Gymnasticae, 69(2).

Chan, D. K. C., Tang, T. C., Gucciardi, D. F., Ntoumanis, N., Dimmock, J. A., Donovan, R. J., ... & Hagger, M. S. (2020). Psychological and behavioural factors of unintentional doping: A preliminary systematic review. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(3), 273-295.

Chester, N., Stuart, M., & Mottram, D. (2022). The role of Athlete Support Personnel in drug use in sport. In Drugs in sport (pp. 108-123). Routledge.

Clancy, S., Owusu-Sekyere, F., Shelley, J., Veltmaat, A., De Maria, A., & Petróczi, A. (2022). The role of personal commitment to integrity in clean sport and anti-doping. Performance Enhancement & Health, 10(4), 100232.

Cox, L. T. J., Bloodworth, A., & McNamee, M. (2022). Doping in recreational Welsh Rugby Union; Athletes’ beliefs and perceptions related to Anti-Doping policy and practice. Performance Enhancement & Health, 10(2), 100211.

Daher, J., El Khoury, D., & Dwyer, J. J. (2021). Education interventions to improve knowledge, beliefs, intentions and practices with respect to dietary supplements and doping substances: A narrative review. Nutrients, 13(11), 3935.

Filleul, V., d'Arripe-Longueville, F., Pavot, D., Bimes, H., Maillot, J., Meinadier, E., ... & Corrion, K. (2024). Doping in elite cycling: a qualitative study of the underlying situations of vulnerability. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1482103.

García-Grimau, E., De la Vega, R., & Casado, A. (2022). Moral disengagement, social norms, and motivational profiles influence attitudes toward doping among Spanish athletics coaches. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 842959.

Hong, H. J., Henning, A., & Dimeo, P. (2020). Life after doping—A cross-country analysis of organisational support for sanctioned athletes. Performance Enhancement & Health, 8(1), 100161.

Hovhannisyan, A., Sahakyan, G., Ukleba, T., Arhip, E., Jalleh, G., & Donovan, R. (2023). Comparative analysis of the influence of coaches' beliefs on the attitude of athletes to the use of prohibited substances. Journal of sociology: bulletin of Yerevan University, 14(1 (37)), 65-79.

Hurst, P., King, A., Massey, K., Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2023). A national anti-doping education programme reduces doping susceptibility in British athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 69, 102512.

Kavussanu, M., Barkoukis, V., Hurst, P., Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M., Skoufa, L., Chirico, A., ... & Ring, C. (2022). A psychological intervention reduces doping likelihood in British and Greek athletes: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 61, 102099.

Kiran, A. (2024). Examining the Impact of'National Anti-Doping Agency Act'on Doping in Indian Sports: An Ethical Inquiry. Issue 2 Int'l JL Mgmt. & Human., 7, 3204.

Kvillemo, P., Strandberg, A. K., Elgán, T. H., & Gripenberg, J. (2022). Facilitators and barriers in preventing doping among recreational athletes: A qualitative interview study among police officers. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1017801.

Naughton, M., Salmon, P. M., Kerherve, H. A., & McLean, S. (2024). Applying a systems thinking lens to anti-doping: A systematic review identifying the contributory factors to doping in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1-15.

Nicholls, A. R., Fairs, L. R., Plata-Andrés, M., Bailey, R., Cope, E., Madigan, D., ... & Chanal, B. (2020). Feasibility randomised controlled trial examining the effects of the Anti-Doping Values in Coach Education (ADVICE) mobile application on doping knowledge and attitudes towards doping among grassroots coaches. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 6(1), e000800.

Nicholls, A. R., Morley, D., Thompson, M. A., Huang, C., Abt, G., Rothwell, M., ... & Ntoumanis, N. (2020). The effects of the iPlayClean education programme on doping attitudes and susceptibility to use banned substances among high-level adolescent athletes from the UK: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Drug Policy, 82, 102820.

Ntoumanis, N., Quested, E., Patterson, L., Kaffe, S., Backhouse, S. H., Pavlidis, G., ... & Gucciardi, D. F. (2021). An intervention to optimise coach-created motivational climates and reduce athlete willingness to dope (CoachMADE): a three-country cluster randomised controlled trial. British journal of sports medicine, 55(4), 213-219.

Patterson, L. B., Backhouse, S. H., & Jones, B. (2023). The role of athlete support personnel in preventing doping: a qualitative study of a rugby union academy. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(1), 70-88.

Petroczi, A., Heyes, A., Thrower, S. N., Martinelli, L. A., Backhouse, S. H., Boardley, I. D., & Respect Consortium. (2021). Understanding and building clean (er) sport together: community-based participatory research with elite athletes and anti-doping organisations from five European countries. Psychology of sport and exercise, 55, 101932.

Piatkowski, T., Cox, L., & Collins, R. (2024). The ethics of enhancement among image and performance enhancing drug coaches. Health Sociology Review, 1-15.

Shadmanfaat, S. M., Kabiri, S., Smith, H. P., Cochran, J. K., Andersen, T. S., & Madahi, J. (2024). Coaching and Doping: A Test of Situational Action Theory. Journal of Drug Issues, 54(4), 521-541.

Shelley, J., N Thrower, S., & Petróczi, A. (2023). Whose job is it anyway? A qualitative investigation into the influence of agents, race organisers, and sponsors on the risk of doping in elite distance running. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 15(1), 23-44.

Tahiraj, E., Zenic, N., Musa, M., Zeljko, I., & Rodek, J. (2024). Beyond Winning: Examining Sociodemographic and Sport Factors Associated with Doping Attitudes in High-Performance Sport Coaches Involved in Olympic Team Sports. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13(2).

Veltmaat, A., Dreiskämper, D., Brueckner, S., Bondarev, D., Heyes, A., Barkoukis, V., & Petróczi, A. (2023). Context matters: athletes’ perception of dopers’ values, actions and vulnerabilities. Frontiers in sports and active living, 5, 1229679.

Weber, K., Patterson, L. B., & Blank, C. (2022). Doping in disabled elite sport: Perceptions, knowledge and opinions from the perspective of German and UK coaches. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 62, 102233.

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2025-01-12
Accepted Date: 2025-01-12
Published Date: 2025-01-12