Evaluating the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery for Value-based Healthcare
DOI:
10.47709/ijmdsa.v2i1.2394Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, orthopedic surgery, ethical implications, surgical navigationDimension Badge Record
Abstract
The potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform value-based healthcare in the area of orthopedic surgery is examined in this research. Orthopedic surgeons and healthcare systems may improve patient outcomes, increase efficiency, and alter care delivery by combining AI algorithms, cutting-edge data analytics, and novel technology. Through case studies and success stories, the article provides a thorough study of the advantages and prospects provided by AI in orthopedic surgery. These instances demonstrate how AI has been successfully applied to several facets of orthopedic surgery, including as diagnosis, planning of the surgical course, surgical navigation, postoperative care, and resource allocation. The ethical and legal ramifications of using AI are also discussed in the study, with a focus on patient autonomy, privacy, accountability, and any potential effects on the healthcare workforce. The potential applications of AI in orthopedic surgery are examined, together with developments in preoperative planning, surgical robotics, remote monitoring, predictive analytics, personalised medicine, research, and innovation. The promise of AI in orthopedic surgery is obvious, despite issues with data quality, privacy, algorithm biases, and legal constraints. The ethical and appropriate application of AI technology in orthopedic surgery has the potential to significantly enhance patient outcomes, lower complications, boost efficiency, and change the way healthcare is provided. This study lays the groundwork for future study and application in the field of orthopedic surgery by offering insightful information on the role of AI in delivering value-based healthcare.
Abstract viewed = 1458 times
References
Chen M, Decary M. AI in healthcare: from hype to impact. Workshop presented at ITCH 2019: Improving Usability, Safety and Patient Outcomes with Health Information Technology, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 2019. Available at: https:// www.slideshare.net/MeiChen39/ai-in-healthcarefrom-hype-toimpact. Accessed June 6, 2019.
Mckinsey and Company. AI adoption advances, but foundational barriers remain. Survey Report. 2018(11). Available at: https:// www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/artificial-intelligence/aiadoption-advances-but-foundational-barriers-remain. Accessed June 6, 2019.
Esteva A, Robicquet A, Ramsundar B, et al. A guide to deep learning in healthcare. Nat Med. 2019; 25(1):24-29.
Bickmore TW, Trinh H, Olafsson S, et al. Safety first: conversational agents for healthcare. In: Moore RJ, Szymanski MH, Arar R, Ren GJ, eds. Studies in Conversational UX Design, Human–Computer Interaction Series. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2018.
Laranjo L, Dunn AG, Tong HL, et al. Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018; 25(9):1248-1258.
Crawford M. Top 6 robotic applications in medicine, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2016(9). Available at: https:// www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/bioengineering/top6-robotic-applications-in-medicine. Accessed June 6, 2019
The American Medical Association. AMA passes first policy recommendations on augmented intelligence. 2018. Available at: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/pressreleases/ama-passes-first-policy-recommendations-augmentedintelligence. Accessed July 1, 2019
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S: Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 2019; 366:447-453.
Ramkumar PN, Karnuta JM, Navarro SM, et al: Preoperative prediction of value metrics and a patient-specific payment model for primary total hip arthroplasty: Development and validation of a deep learning model. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 2228-2234 e2221.
Ramkumar PN, Karnuta JM, Navarro SM, et al: Deep learning preoperatively predicts value metrics for primary total knee arthroplasty: Development and validation of an artificial neural network model. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:2220-2227 e2221.
Karhade AV, Schwab JH, Bedair HS: Development of machine learning algorithms for prediction of sustained postoperative opioid prescriptions after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: 2272-2277 e2271.
Navarro SM, Wang EY, Haeberle HS, et al: Machine learning and primary total knee arthroplasty: Patient forecasting for a patientspecific payment model. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:3617-3623.
Urish K, Reznik AM: How would a computer diagnose arthritis on a radiograph? AAOS Now 2018:32-33.
Siddiq, M. (2021). Integration of Machine Learning in Clinical Decision Support Systems. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 1(12), 1579-1591
Kotti M, Duffell LD, Faisal AA, and McGregor AH: Detecting knee osteoarthritis and its discriminating parameters using random forests. Med Eng Phys 2017; 43:19-29.
Kozic N, Weber S, Bu¨ chler P, et al.: Optimisation of orthopaedic implant design using statistical shape space analysis based on level sets. Med Image Anal 2010; 14:265-275.
Ramkumar PN, Haeberle HS, Ramanathan D, et al: Remote patient monitoring using mobile health for total knee arthroplasty: Validation of a wearable and machine learning-based surveillance platform. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:2253-2259.
Siddiq, M. (2023). Exploring the Role of Machine Learning in Contact Tracing for Public Health: Benefits, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations. American Journal of Economic and Management Business (AJEMB), 2(4), 89-103.
Siddiq, M. (2022). Use of Machine Learning to predict patient developing a disease or condition for early diagnose. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 1(1).
Rondon AJ, Tan TL, Greenky MR, et al: Who goes to inpatient rehabilitation or skilled nursing facilities unexpectedly following total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:1348-1351 e1341.
Siddiq, M. (2020). ML-based Medical Image Analysis for Anomaly Detection in CT Scans, X-rays, and MRIs. Devotion Journal of Community Service, 2(1), 53-64.
Courtney PM, Bohl DD, Lau EC, Ong KL, Jacobs JJ, and Della Valle CJ: Risk adjustment is necessary in medicare bundled payment models for total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:2368-2375.
Clement RC, Derman PB, Kheir MM, et al: Risk adjustment for medicare total knee arthroplasty bundled payments. Orthopedics 2016; 39:e911-e916.
Humbyrd CJ: The ethics of bundled payments in total joint replacement: “Cherry picking” and “lemon dropping.” J Clin Ethics 2018; 28:62-68.
Karnuta JMHH, Luu BC, Roth AL, et al: Artificial intelligence to identify arthroplasty implants from radiographs of the hip. J Arthroplasty [published online ahead of print November 16, 2020] doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.015.
Goltz DE, Ryan SP, Hopkins TJ, et al: A novel risk calculator predicts 90-day readmission following total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:547-556
Siddiq, M. (2022). Revolutionizing Drug Discovery; Transformative Role of Machine Learning. BULLET: Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(02), 162-170..
Rana, A., Reddy, A., Shrivastava, A., Verma, D., Ansari, M. S., & Singh, D. (2022, October). Secure and Smart Healthcare System using IoT and Deep Learning Models. In 2022 2nd International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS) (pp. 915-922). IEEE.
Yirsaw, A. W., Gillespie, A., Zhang, F., Smith, T. P., Bickhart, D. M., Gunasekaran, K. P., ... & Baldwin, C. L. (2022). Defining the caprine ?? T cell WC1 multigenic array and evaluation of its expressed sequences and gene structure conservation among goat breeds and relative to cattle. Immunogenetics, 74(3), 347-365.
Gunasekaran, K. P., Tiwari, K., & Acharya, R. (2023). Deep learning based Auto Tuning for Database Management System. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12747.
Ramkumar PN, Navarro SM, Haeberle HS, et al: Development and validation of a machine learning algorithm after primary total hip arthroplasty: Applications to length of stay and payment models. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:632-637.
Jayakumar, P., Moore, M. L., & Bozic, K. J. (2019). Value-based healthcare: Can artificial intelligence provide value in orthopaedic surgery?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 477(8), 1777- 1780.
Jayakumar, P. (2022). Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Value-based Healthcare: Can Generative Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models be a Catalyst for Value-based Healthcare?. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 10-1097.
Makhni, E. C., Makhni, S., & Ramkumar, P. N. (2021). Artificial intelligence for the orthopaedic surgeon: an overview of potential benefits, limitations, and clinical applications. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 29(6), 235-243.
Maffulli, N., Rodriguez, H. C., Stone, I. W., Nam, A., Song, A., Gupta, M., ... & Gupta, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthopedic surgery: a systematic review protocol. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 15, 1-5.
Downloads
ARTICLE Published HISTORY
Accepted Date: 2023-06-06
Published Date: 2023-06-09
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aftab Tariq, Ahmad Yousaf Gill, Hafiz Khawar Hussain
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
