ac

Comparing MCDM Methods for Assessing the Lecturer Performance Index at Dipa Makassar University

Authors

  • Suryani Universitas Dipa Makassar, Indonesia
  • Madyana Patasik Universitas Dipa Makassar, Indonesia
  • Stiffany Lourens Zeannyfer Universitas Dipa Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andhiny Nurakzhany Syahputri Universitas Dipa Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

10.47709/brilliance.v4i2.4979

Keywords:

Assessing the Lecturer's Performance, The lecturer's performance index, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Weighted Product (WP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Multi-Objective Optimization By Ratio Analysis (MOORA)

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

Assessing or evaluating the Lecturer's Performance, presented through the Lecturer Performance Index, is a crucial element in the university system that impacts the quality of The University's Three Main Purposes, which include teaching, research, and community service. To ensure objective and accurate evaluations, methods that can accommodate various relevant criteria are needed. One increasingly popular approach is the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, which allows for evaluating and comparing alternatives based on multiple criteria. This research compares several MCDM methods, namely Weighted Product (WP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), and Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA), used to assess the lecturer's performance at Dipa University Makassar. The WP method can handle criteria with different units, SAW is simpler and easier to apply, while MOORA offers a more comprehensive analysis. This study also identifies challenges in assessing the lecturer's performance, such as the influence of students' subjective evaluations that may lead to bias, as well as the addition of several of the lecturer's performance evaluation criteria such as teaching innovation, student mentoring, international and national journal publications, internal publications, and book publications. Additionally, self-development criteria based on academic fields are considered. The findings of this research are expected to provide insights into effective MCDM methods for the lecturer's performance evaluation and offer recommendations for educational institutions to choose the appropriate and transparent evaluation method. By using MCDM, the objectivity and accuracy of the lecturer's performance evaluations can be improved, biases can be reduced, and contributions can be made toward developing more fair and systematic evaluation standards.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 49 times

References

Abdullah, M. A., & Aldisa, R. T. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Perbandingan Metode MOORA Dengan MOOSRA Dalam Pemilihan Hair Stylish. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (JSON), 5(1), 131–140.

Abdullah, M. H. (2024). Penerapan Metode Weighted Product dan Rank Order Centroid dalam Penilaian Kinerja Staff Adminstrasi. Journal of Data Science and Information Systems, 2(1), 9–17.

Alam, S., & Suryani, S. (2024). Komparasi Metode Multi-Criteria Decision Making dalam Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa. Digital Transformation Technology, 4(1), 558–568.

Andriyani, W., Natsir, F., Asri, Y. N., Hidayat, M. S., Yati, Y., Afandi, I. R., Diningrat, M. S. M., Rahmatulloh, A., Akbari, F., & Wahyuningtyas, I. (2024). AI GENERATIF DAN MUTU PENDIDIKAN. Penerbit Widina.

Anggrawan, A. (2019). Analisis deskriptif hasil belajar pembelajaran tatap muka dan pembelajaran online menurut gaya belajar mahasiswa. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 18(2), 339–346.

Banamtuan, P. Y. C., Pasaribu, A., & Ari, Y. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Teknologi (SINTEK), 4(1), 13–18.

Efendi, N., & Sholeh, M. I. (2023). Manajemen pendidikan dalam meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran. Academicus: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 68–85.

Ginting, G., Mesran, M., & Manalu, Y. F. (2021). Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam Pemberian Reward Bagi Pegawai Honorer. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Information Science (SENARIS), 3(1), 19–25.

Gunawan, P. W., Firdaus, A., Irmawati, I., Sepriano, S., Arifin, N. Y., Surianto, D. F., Suryani, S., Hermawan, E., & Yanuarsyah, I. (2023). SISTEM PENGAMBIL KEPUTUSAN: Teori dan Studi Kasus dengan Berbagai Metode SPK Populer. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.

Ismail, I. A., Desnita, Q., Arif, K., & Refitaniza, M. I. (2024). Eksplorasi Potensi Vision Language Model (VLM) sebagai Alat Bantu Penilaian Esai yang Efisien dan Objektif di Era Kurikulum Merdeka. IJCC, 1, 5.

Kumala Hadi, D. (2020). Pengaruh Halo Effect terhadap Penilaian Risiko oleh Auditor: Peran Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderisasi.

Kusumawardani, A., Rahmadhani, S., Praptitorini, M. D., & Kase, R. (2023a). PENGARUH SELF-ATTRIBUTION BIAS DAN RISK PERCEPTIONS TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN INVESTOR PASAR MODAL: Studi pada Kebijakan Prosentase ARB 15% Oleh Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 224–234.

Kusumawardani, A., Rahmadhani, S., Praptitorini, M. D., & Kase, R. (2023b). PENGARUH SELF-ATTRIBUTION BIAS DAN RISK PERCEPTIONS TERHADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN INVESTOR PASAR MODAL: Studi pada Kebijakan Prosentase ARB 15% Oleh Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 224–234.

Mulyani, N., & Hutahaean, J. (2021). Penerapan Metode Simple Additivie Weighting Untuk Mengefektifkan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 5(3), 1068–1072.

Murtopo, A. A., & Putri, R. A. (2016). Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerimaan Pegawai Menggunakan Metode SAW pada PDAM Tirta Dharma Tegal. Creative Information Technology Journal, 3(2), 135–148.

Novianti, T. (2023). Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Media Nusa Creative (MNC Publishing).

Nuroji, N. (2024). Kombinasi Metode Pembobotan Rank Reciprocal dan Simple Additive Weighting Dalam Pemilihan Tempat Servis Kendaraan. CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering, and Informatics, 2(2), 88–97.

Putri, V. A., Sotyawardani, K. C. A., & Rafael, R. A. (2023). Peran artificial intelligence dalam proses pembelajaran mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Ilmu Sosial (SNIIS), 2, 615–630.

Qurtubi, A., Rukiyanto, B. A., Rusmayani, N. G. A. L., Hita, I. P. A. D., Nurzaima, N., & Ismaya, R. (2023). Pengembangan Metode Penilaian Kinerja Guru Berbasis Kompetensi Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 6(4), 3051–3061.

Rachmad, Y. E., Rahman, A., Judijanto, L., Pudjiarti, E. S., Runtunuwu, P. C. H., Lestari, N. E., Wulandari, D., Suhirman, L., Rahmawati, F. A., & Mukhlis, I. R. (2024). Integrasi metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif: Panduan praktis penelitian campuran. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.

Rozali, C., Karimah, M., & Marwati, F. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Calon Peserta Olimpiade Dengan Metode Vikor Dan Moora. Spectrum: Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(3), 222–230.

Shiddieq, D. F., & Nazib, I. N. (2018). PENERAPAN METODE WEIGHTED PRODUCT (WP) DALAM PROSES SELEKSI CALON KARYAWAN (STUDI KASUS PT. ISH BANDUNG). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, 1(1).

Sintaro, S. (2024). Multiple Criteria Decision Making Penentuan Juara Lomba Roasting Kopi Menggunakan Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison. Jurnal Ilmiah Computer Science, 2(2), 58–69.

Sudipa, I. G. I., Kharisma, L. P. I., Waas, D. V., Sari, F., Sutoyo, M. N., Rusliyadi, M., Setiawan, I., Martaseli, E., Sandhiyasa, I. M. S., & Sulistianto, S. W. (2023). Penerapan Decision Support System (Dss) Dalam Berbagai Bidang (Revolusi Industri 4.0 Menuju Era Society 5.0). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Sudipa, I. G. I., Wardoyo, R., Hatta, H. R., Sagena, U., Gunawan, I. M. A. O., Zahro, H. Z., & Adhicandra, I. (2023a). MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING: Teori & Penerapan Metode Pengambilan Keputusan dengan MCDM. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Sudipa, I. G. I., Wardoyo, R., Hatta, H. R., Sagena, U., Gunawan, I. M. A. O., Zahro, H. Z., & Adhicandra, I. (2023b). MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING: Teori & Penerapan Metode Pengambilan Keputusan dengan MCDM. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Supriyadi, E. (2017). Pengembangan model evaluasi untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan teknik elektro. Jurnal Edukasi Elektro, 1(1).

Surahman, A. (2024). Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menggunakan Kombinasi Metode Multi-Objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dan Pembobotan Entropy. CHAIN: Journal of Computer Technology, Computer Engineering, and Informatics, 2(1), 28–36.

Unaradjan, D. D. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Penerbit Unika Atma Jaya Jakarta.

Yulisma, L., Sukri, S., Aida, D. N., Rosmaladewi, O., & Hanafiah, N. (2023). Evaluasi Kinerja Badan Penjaminan Mutu Internal dalam Mendukung Standarisasi Pendidikan Tinggi di Universitas Galuh. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 10(2), 259–266.

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2024-11-19
Accepted Date: 2024-11-19
Published Date: 2025-01-06

How to Cite

Suryani, S., Patasik, M., Zeannyfer, S. L., & Syahputri, A. N. (2025). Comparing MCDM Methods for Assessing the Lecturer Performance Index at Dipa Makassar University. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 4(2), 847-857. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v4i2.4979