ac

Enhancing the Accuracy of Diabetes Prediction Using Feedforward Neural Networks: Strategies for Improved Recall and Generalization

Authors

  • Herry Setiawan Politeknik Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Ary Firnanda Akademi Komunitas Negeri Aceh Barat, Indonesia
  • Ummul Khair Politeknik Negeri Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

10.47709/brilliance.v4i1.3888

Keywords:

Diabetes, Feedforward neural networks, prediction, classification, deep learning

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

This study explores the development and evaluation of a neural network model for predicting diabetes based on clinical data. The model was built using the Keras API with TensorFlow backend. Key steps included data preprocessing, such as feature scaling with `StandardScaler` and splitting the data into training and testing sets. The neural network architecture consisted of an input layer, two hidden layers with ReLU activation functions, and an output layer with a sigmoid activation function, optimized using the Adam optimizer and binary crossentropy loss function.

The model was trained over 50 epochs with a batch size of 10, incorporating a validation split of 20% to monitor performance on unseen data during training. The results demonstrated a high accuracy of approximately 97% on the test set, indicating the model's efficacy in predicting diabetes. Further analysis using a confusion matrix revealed a high count of true positives and true negatives, alongside minimal false positives and false negatives, confirming the model's robustness. These findings suggest that neural networks can be effectively employed for diabetes prediction, offering significant potential for integration into clinical decision support systems. However, further validation with larger and more diverse datasets, alongside considerations for data imbalance and model interpretability, is recommended to ensure generalizability and practical application in real-world healthcare settings.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 69 times

References

Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., & others. (2016). ${$TensorFlow$}$: a system for ${$Large-Scale$}$ machine learning. 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), 265–283.

Bergman, M., Manco, M., Satman, I., Chan, J., Schmidt, M. I., Sesti, G., Fiorentino, T. V., Abdul-Ghani, M., Jagannathan, R., Aravindakshan, P. K. T., & others. (2024). International Diabetes Federation Position Statement on the 1-hour post-load plasma glucose for the diagnosis of intermediate hyperglycaemia and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 209, 111589.

Fan, Y., Long, E., Cai, L., Cao, Q., Wu, X., & Tong, R. (2021). Machine learning approaches to predict risks of diabetic complications and poor glycemic control in nonadherent type 2 diabetes. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 12, 665951.

Gavan, N. A., Veresiu, I. A., Vinik, E. J., Vinik, A. I., Florea, B., Bondor, C. I., & others. (2016). Delay between onset of symptoms and seeking physician intervention increases risk of diabetic foot complications: results of a cross-sectional population-based survey. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2016.

Hameed, I., Masoodi, S. R., Mir, S. A., Nabi, M., Ghazanfar, K., & Ganai, B. A. (2015). Type 2 diabetes mellitus: from a metabolic disorder to an inflammatory condition. World Journal of Diabetes, 6(4), 598.

Hasan, M. K., Alam, M. A., Das, D., Hossain, E., & Hasan, M. (2020). Diabetes prediction using ensembling of different machine learning classifiers. IEEE Access, 8, 76516–76531.

Hussain, A., & Naaz, S. (2021). Prediction of diabetes mellitus: comparative study of various machine learning models. International Conference on Innovative Computing and Communications: Proceedings of ICICC 2020, Volume 2, 103–115.

Lynch, P. (2022). Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus-Medical Independent.

Mukhtar, Y., Galalain, A., & Yunusa, U. (2020). A modern overview on diabetes mellitus: a chronic endocrine disorder. European Journal of Biology, 5(2), 1–14.

Ojha, V. K., Abraham, A., & Snášel, V. (2017). Metaheuristic design of feedforward neural networks: A review of two decades of research. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 60, 97–116.

Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Sanchez-Castillo, M., Chica-Olmo, M., & Chica-Rivas, M. (2015). Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: An evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines. Ore Geology Reviews, 71, 804–818.

Sejdinovi?, D., Gurbeta, L., Badnjevi?, A., Malenica, M., Duji?, T., ?auševi?, A., Bego, T., & Mehmedovi?, L. D. (2017). Classification of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes using artificial neural network. CMBEBIH 2017: Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering 2017, 685–689.

Thomas, L., Kumar, M., & Annappa, B. (2016). Discovery of optimal neurons and hidden layers in feed-forward Neural Network. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), 286–291.

Ting, D. S. W., Cheung, G. C. M., & Wong, T. Y. (2016). Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 44(4), 260–277.

Udler, M. S. (2019). Type 2 diabetes: multiple genes, multiple diseases. Current Diabetes Reports, 19, 1–9.

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2024-05-20
Accepted Date: 2024-05-21
Published Date: 2024-06-07

How to Cite

Setiawan, H., Firnanda, A. ., & Khair, U. . (2024). Enhancing the Accuracy of Diabetes Prediction Using Feedforward Neural Networks: Strategies for Improved Recall and Generalization. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v4i1.3888

Most read articles by the same author(s)