ac

Advanced Seismic Data Analysis: Comparative study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Data Prediction and Understanding

Authors

  • Gregorius Airlangga Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia

DOI:

10.47709/brilliance.v3i2.3501

Keywords:

Seismic Data Analysis, Clustering, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Autoencoder

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

This study delves into the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques for the analysis of seismic data, aiming to identify and categorize patterns and anomalies within seismic events. Using a robust dataset, we applied three distinct clustering approaches: K-Means, DBSCAN, and an Autoencoder-based method, each offering unique perspectives on the data. K-Means clustering provided a fundamental partitioning of the data into five predefined clusters, facilitating the identification of broad seismic patterns. DBSCAN, a density-based clustering algorithm, offered insights into the spatial distribution and density of seismic events, adeptly pinpointing anomalies and outliers that signify unusual seismic activity. The Autoencoder, leveraging deep learning, excelled in capturing complex and non-linear relationships within the data, revealing subtle patterns not immediately apparent through traditional methods. The effectiveness of these clustering techniques was quantitatively evaluated using the Silhouette Score and the Davies-Bouldin Score, alongside visual assessments through PCA and t-SNE for dimensionality reduction. The results indicated that while K-Means provided clear partitioning, DBSCAN excelled in outlier detection, and the Autoencoder offered a balanced approach with its nuanced analysis capabilities. Our comprehensive analysis underscores the significance of employing a multi-methodological approach in seismic data analysis, as each method contributes uniquely to the understanding of seismic events. The insights gained from this study are valuable for enhancing predictive models and improving disaster risk management strategies in seismology. Future research directions include the integration of additional seismic features, validation against larger datasets, and the development of hybrid models to further refine the predictive accuracy of seismic event analysis.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 56 times

References

AlAli, A., & Anifowose, F. (2022). Seismic velocity modeling in the digital transformation era: a review of the role of machine learning. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 1–14.

Aranda, A. M., Sele, K., Etchanchu, H., Guyt, J. Y., & Vaara, E. (2021). From big data to rich theory: Integrating critical discourse analysis with structural topic modeling. European Management Review, 18(3), 197–214.

Asming, V. E., Asming, S. V, Fedorov, A. V, Yevtyugina, Z. A., Chigerev, Y. N., & Kremenetskaya, E. O. (2022). System for automatic recognition of types of sources of regional seismic events. Seismic Instruments, 58(5), 509–520.

Dramsch, J. S. (2020). 70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review. Advances in Geophysics, 61, 1–55.

Gerstenberger, M. C., Marzocchi, W., Allen, T., Pagani, M., Adams, J., Danciu, L., … others. (2020). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis at regional and national scales: State of the art and future challenges. Reviews of Geophysics, 58(2), e2019RG000653.

Ghasemi, A., & Stephens, M. T. (2022). Building clustering for regional seismic response and damage analysis. Earthquake Spectra, 38(4), 2941–2969.

Ji, K., Wen, R., Ren, Y., & Dhakal, Y. P. (2020). Nonlinear seismic site response classification using K-means clustering algorithm: Case study of the September 6, 2018 Mw6. 6 Hokkaido Iburi-Tobu earthquake, Japan. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 128, 105907.

Jiao, P., & Alavi, A. H. (2020). Artificial intelligence in seismology: advent, performance and future trends. Geoscience Frontiers, 11(3), 739–744.

Johnson, C. W., Ben-Zion, Y., Meng, H., & Vernon, F. (2020). Identifying different classes of seismic noise signals using unsupervised learning. Geophysical Research Letters, 47(15), e2020GL088353.

Liu, W., & Hu, W. (n.d.). Oversampling of Tabular Data for Imbalanced Learning Via Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Available at SSRN 4673719.

Liu, X., Li, B., Li, J., Chen, X., Li, Q., & Chen, Y. (2021). Semi-supervised deep autoencoder for seismic facies classification. Geophysical Prospecting, 69(6), 1295–1315.

Ma, Z., & Mei, G. (2021). Deep learning for geological hazards analysis: Data, models, applications, and opportunities. Earth-Science Reviews, 223, 103858.

Mousavi, S. M., & Beroza, G. C. (2022). Deep-learning seismology. Science, 377(6607), eabm4470.

Mousavi, S. M., & Beroza, G. C. (2023). Machine Learning in Earthquake Seismology. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 51, 105–129.

Noureldin, M., Ali, A., Sim, S., & Kim, J. (2022). A machine learning procedure for seismic qualitative assessment and design of structures considering safety and serviceability. Journal of Building Engineering, 50, 104190.

Posamentier, H. W., Paumard, V., & Lang, S. C. (2022). Principles of seismic stratigraphy and seismic geomorphology I: Extracting geologic insights from seismic data. Earth-Science Reviews, 228, 103963.

Ros, F., Riad, R., & Guillaume, S. (2023). PDBI: A partitioning Davies-Bouldin index for clustering evaluation. Neurocomputing, 528, 178–199.

Shutaywi, M., & Kachouie, N. N. (2021). Silhouette analysis for performance evaluation in machine learning with applications to clustering. Entropy, 23(6), 759.

Soh, H., & Demiris, Y. (2015). Spatio-temporal learning with the online finite and infinite echo-state Gaussian processes. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 26(3), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2014.2316291

Sun, H., Burton, H. V, & Huang, H. (2021). Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101816.

Xu, G., & Haq, B. U. (2022). Seismic facies analysis: Past, present and future. Earth-Science Reviews, 224, 103876.

Zhao, J., Han, X., Ouyang, M., & Burke, A. F. (2023). Specialized deep neural networks for battery health prognostics: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Energy Chemistry.

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2024-01-24
Accepted Date: 2024-01-24
Published Date: 2024-01-31

How to Cite

Airlangga, G. (2024). Advanced Seismic Data Analysis: Comparative study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Data Prediction and Understanding. Brilliance: Research of Artificial Intelligence, 3(2), 456-465. https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v3i2.3501