Establish and Implement PAM and PRM ISO 20000-1:2011
DOI:
10.47709/brilliance.v3i2.3296Keywords:
ISO/IEC 20000, ISO/IEC 27001, Process Assessment, Process Capability, Service Management SystemDimension Badge Record
Abstract
Most enterprises are now using information technology services as their assets to support business objectives. These kind of services are provided by internal service provider (inside enterprise) or external service provider (outside enterprise). To deliver quality information technology services, service provider (which from now on will be called “organization”) either internal or external, must have standard for service management system. At present, the standard that is recognized as best practice for service management system for organization is international standard ISO/IEC 20000:2011. The most important part of this international standard is the first part or ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011-Service Management System Requirement, because it contains 22 for organization processes as requirement to be implemented in organizational environment in order to build, manage and deliver quality service to customer. Assessing organization management processes is the first step to implement ISO/IEC 20000:2011 into the organization management processes. This assessment needs Process Assessment Model (PAM) as assessment instrument. PAM comprises two parts: Process Reference Model (PRM) and Measurement Framework (MF). PRM is built by transforming the 22 process of ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 and MF is based on ISO/IEC 33020. This assessment instrument was designed to assess the capability of service management process in Divisi Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi (Information Systems and Technology Division) as an internal organization of PT Pos Indonesia. The result of this assessment model can be proposed to improve the capability of service management system.
Abstract viewed = 88 times
References
Amesho, K. T., Edoun, E. I., Naidoo, V., & Pooe, S. “Managing competitive advantage through technology and innovation systems and its impacts on service delivery within the Kaohsiung City Government in Taiwan,” South African Journal of Information Management, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2021.
Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. “Competitive advantage implication of different Product Service System business models: Consequences of ‘not-replicable’capabilities,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 247, pp. 119121, 2020.
Kalodimos, J., & Leavitt, K. “Experimental Shareholder Activism: A novel approach for studying top management decision making and employee career issues,“ Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 120, pp. 103429, 2020.
Zimon, D., & Madzík, P. “Standardized management systems and risk management in the supply chain,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 305-327, 2020.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Saunders, A. (2009). Wired for innovation: How information technology is reshaping the economy. Mit Press.
Gunasekaran, A., Subramanian, N., & Papadopoulos, T. (2017). Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: A review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 99, 14-33.
Mesquida, A. L., & Mas, A. (2015). Integrating IT service management requirements into the organizational management system. Computer standards & interfaces, 37, 80-91.
Al Faruq, B., Herlianto, H. R., Simbolon, S. H., Utama, D. N., & Wibowo, A. (2020). Integration of ITIL V3, ISO 20000 & iso 27001: 2013forit services and security management system. International Journal, 9(3).
Mehmood, T. “Does information technology competencies and fleet management practices lead to effective service delivery? Empirical evidence from E-commerce industry,” International Journal of Technology, Innovation and Management (IJTIM), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 14-41. 2021.
Usak, M., Kubiatko, M., Shabbir, M. S., Viktorovna Dudnik, O., Jermsittiparsert, K., & Rajabion, L. “Health care service delivery based on the Internet of things: A systematic and comprehensive study,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. e4179, 2020.
Blessing, L., Chakrabarti, A. “DRM: A design research methodology,” Les Science de la Conception, 2002.
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011, Information Technology - Service Management Service Management System Requirement. 2011.
Menken, I., Blokdijk, G., Malone, T. “Managing Across the Lifecycle of IT Services Best Practices Study and Implementation Guide”. London: Emereo Pty Ltd. 2009
Knapp, D. The ITSM process design guide : “developing, reengineering, and improving IT service management”. U.S.A: J. Ross Publishing. 2010.
Posthumus, S., von Solms, R. (2004): A framework for the governance of information security, Computers & Security, 2004.
Mesquida, A. L., Mas, A. (2015): Implementing information security best practices on software lifecycle processes: The ISO/IEC 15504 Security Extension. Computers & Security, 2014.
Lami, G., Fabbrini, F., Buglione, L. (2014): An ISO/IEC 33000-Compliant Measurement Framework for Software Process Sustainability Assessment, 2014.
ISO/IEC 33020, Information technology – Process asssessment – process measurement framework for assessment of process capability, 2015.
VDA QMC Working Group, “Automotive SPICE Proceess Assessment”, 2015.
Downloads
ARTICLE Published HISTORY
Accepted Date: 2023-12-06
Published Date: 2023-12-29
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Harvard K. Najoan, Denny J. Mawuntu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
info@itscience.org, web: 
