Analysis of the Selection of the Best Household Ceramics Using the Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) Method
DOI:
10.47709/cnahpc.v6i4.4784Keywords:
Household Ceramics, Decision-making, Copras MethodDimension Badge Record
Abstract
Rapid advances in communication and information technology due to globalization have had a significant impact on a number of industries, including the industrial sector. The industry is taking great advantage of the capabilities of this technology to search, store, distribute and present information. The ceramic sector in Indonesia looks increasingly promising every year. One type of building material that functions to cover the floor and beautify its appearance is ceramic. When choosing ceramics, consumers become confused because of the availability of various brands (vendors) with different themes and quality. When deciding on product quality, a decision support system can be implemented to offer a structured evaluation that assists stakeholders in the business and consumers in assessing high-quality ceramic options. DSS The complex proportional assessment method, or COPRAS, is used in system design. In improving the accuracy and efficiency of decision making, the COPRAS approach can evaluate several options and estimate them based on their utility level when attribute values ??are expressed in intervals. Based on the findings of this research, the application of the COPRAS method in the decision-making process to determine the best household ceramics can be used in selecting the best household ceramics by collecting data on ceramic criteria and the alternative used is the type of ceramic. The weights obtained for each criterion are then normalized which are then used to determine the Ui for each alternative, so that based on the results of this research the best household ceramics are obtained, namely Redhorse type ceramics with a Ui value of 100%, Fortuna type with a Ui value of 99.27%. , Prato type with a Ui value of 98.82%, Crystal type with a Ui value of 98.71%, Mulia type with a Ui value of 88.50%, Vancouver type with a Ui value of 88.24%, Murano type with a Ui value of 84.97% and the Virginia type with a Ui value of 79.77%.
Downloads
Abstract viewed = 85 times
References
Ambar, A. (1997). Pengetahuan Keramik Jogjakarta. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Budiyanto. (2008). Kriya Keramik (Untuk Menengah Kejuruan) Jilid I. Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.
Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2013). Assessment and Additive Ratio Assessment-based Approaches: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 1(2).
Cipta, H., & Hasugian, A. . (2018). Analisa Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan PasanganHidup Menurut Budaya Karo Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analitycal HierarchyProcess (AHP). ALGORITMA:Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informatika, 2(1).
Mesran, P. et al. (2017). Implementation of Complex Proportional Assessment Method in the Selection of Mango Seeds. Int. J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol, 3(7), 397–402.
Nurfadila, S. et al. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Seleksi Karyawan Baru dengan Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Tsukamoto.(. JISTech (Journal of Islamic Science AndTechnology).
Pradana, R., & Samsudin, S. (2023). Sistem Rekomendasi Pemilihan Keramik Berbasis Android Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy MCDM dan SAW. Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi Dan Teknik Informatika), 8(2), 499–511.
Roy, J. et al. (2019). An extended COPRAS model for multi-criteria decision-making problems and its application in web-based hotel evaluation and selection. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1).
Siregar, A. D. U. et al. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Marketing Terbaik di PT. Alfa Scorph Menggunakan Metode COPRAS. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (JSON), 2(1), 62–68.
Syaputra, A. F. et al. (2023). Penerapan Metode Weighted Product dan Simple Additive Weighting dalam Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Keramik Berkualitas (Studi Kasus: Toko Keramik Abadi). Jurnal Elektronika Listrik Dan Teknologi Informasi Terapan, 5(2), 53–60.
Tonni, L. (2020). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan?: Metode dan Im-plementasi. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Downloads
ARTICLE Published HISTORY
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Amizaeni Apriza, Hendra Cipta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.