Simple Additive Weighting to Determine The Best Employee in a Freight Forwarding and Logistics Company

Fernando Siahaan; Syaiful Anwar; Felix W Handono

doi:10.47709/cnahpc.v6i3.4244

Authors

Fernando Siahaan Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Syaiful Anwar
Felix W Handono

DOI:

10.47709/cnahpc.v6i3.4244

Keywords:

Employee, criteria, the company, Multi Criteria Choice Making, Simple Additive Weigthing

Dimension Badge Record

Abstract

The problem is that there is no method used to determine the best employee in the company based on the criteria set by the company. The purpose of this research is to propose simple additive weighting as a method for finding the best employees according to the weighting carried out. To make decisions, there are several criteria and criteria weights that are needed as a measuring tool to assess employees who will be promoted, attendance, QSM, Quiz, leading. Period of work and team work. The weight value of each criterion is attendance 0.20, QSM 0.25, Quiz 0.15, leading 0.20, tenure 0.10 and team work 0.10. Quality service management (QSM) if sub criteria < 200 QSM value 1, sub criteria 201 - 300 QSM value 2, sub criteria 301 - 400 QSM value 3, sub criteria 401 - 500 QSM value 4, sub criteria 501 - 600 QSM value 5. The results of the analysis with the saw method obtained two employees who got the highest score who had the right to be promoted for promotion with a value of 84.25 and 82.25. the conclusion is that the SAW method is influential in supporting and facilitating decision making to determine promoted employees.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 78 times

References

Abadi, S., Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Noor, S. S. M., Safar, J., Mohamed, A. K., Embong, W. H. W., Mohamad, A. M., Hehsan, A., Basiron, B., Ihwani, S. S., Maseleno, A., Muslihudin, M., Satria, F., Irawan, D., & Hartati, S. (2018). Determination of the best quail eggs using simple additive weighting. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2.27 Special Issue 27), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.27.11967

Adela, H., Azmi Jasmi, K., Basiron, B., Huda, M., & Maseleno, A. (2018). Selection of dancer member using simple additive weighting. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1096. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.11983

Agar, D. A., Hansen, P., Rudolfsson, M., & Blagojevi?, B. (2023). Combining behavioural TOPSIS and six multi-criteria weighting methods to rank biomass fuel pellets for energy use in Sweden. Energy Reports, 10, 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.007

Aljaghoub, H., Alasad, S., Alashkar, A., AlMallahi, M., Hasan, R., Obaideen, K., & Alami, A. H. (2023). Comparative analysis of various oxygen production techniques using multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Thermofluids, 17(December 2022), 100261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2022.100261

Aminudin, N., Huda, M., Kilani, A., Embong, W. H. W., Mohamed, A. M., Basiron, B., Ihwani, S. S., Noor, S. S. M., Jasmi, K. A., Safar, J., Ivanova, N. L., Maseleno, A., Triono, A., & Nungsiati. (2018). Higher education selection using simple additive weighting. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2.27 Special Issue 27), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.27.11731

Anggraeni, E. Y., Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Safar, J., Jasmi, K. A., Mohamed, A. K., Hehsan, A., Basiron, B., Ihwani, S. S., Embong, W. H. W., Mohamad, A. M., Noor, S. S. M., Fauzi, A. N., Wijaya, D. A., & Masrur, M. (2018). Poverty level grouping using SAW method. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2.27 Special Issue 27), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.27.11948

Assagaf, A., Ibrahim, A., & Suranto, C. (2018). Membangun Sistem Informasi Penjadwalan Dengan Metode Algoritma Genetika Pada Laboratorium Teknik Informatika Universitas Muhammadiyah Maluku Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah ILKOMINFO - Ilmu Komputer & Informatika, 1(2), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.47324/ilkominfo.v1i2.13

Barbara, F., Moreira, M. Â. L., Fávero, L. P., & dos Santos, M. (2023). Interactive Internet-based Tool Proposal for the WASPAS method: a contribution for decision-making process. Procedia Computer Science, 221, 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.07.028

Barton, D. N., Sundt, H., Bustos, A. A., Fjeldstad, H. P., Hedger, R., Forseth, T., Berit Köhler, Aas, Ø., Alfredsen, K., & Madsen, A. L. (2020). Multi-criteria decision analysis in Bayesian networks - Diagnosing ecosystem service trade-offs in a hydropower regulated river. Environmental Modelling and Software, 124(December 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.104604

Biswas, T. K., Abbasi, A., & Chakrabortty, R. K. (2024). A cost-effective seed selection model for multi-constraint influence maximization in social networks. Decision Analytics Journal, 11(May), 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100474

Boix-Cots, D., Pardo-Bosch, F., & Pujadas, P. (2023). A systematic review on multi-criteria group decision-making methods based on weights: Analysis and classification scheme. Information Fusion, 96(March), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.004

Bourequat, W., & Mourad, H. (2021). Sentiment Analysis Approach for Analyzing iPhone Release using Support Vector Machine. International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems, 2(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.25008/ijadis.v2i1.1216

Chatterjee, S., & Chakraborty, S. (2024). A study on the effects of objective weighting methods on TOPSIS-based parametric optimization of non-traditional machining processes. Decision Analytics Journal, 11(June 2023), 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2024.100451

Cinelli, M., Kadzi?ski, M., Miebs, G., Gonzalez, M., & S?owi?ski, R. (2022). Recommending multiple criteria decision analysis methods with a new taxonomy-based decision support system. European Journal of Operational Research, 302(2), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.01.011

Ibrahim, A., & Surya, R. A. (2019). The Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method in Decision Support System for the Best School Selection in Jambi. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1338(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1338/1/012054

Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D. (2016). Simple additive weighting - A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 54, 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.042

Krisnawijaya, N. N. K., Tekinerdogan, B., Catal, C., & van der Tol, R. (2023). Multi-Criteria decision analysis approach for selecting feasible data analytics platforms for precision farming. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 209(November 2022), 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.107869

Machida, M., Nakamura, I., Saito, R., Nakaya, T., Hanibuchi, T., Takamiya, T., Odagiri, Y., Fukushima, N., Kikuchi, H., & Amagasa, S. (2020). Incorrect use of face masks during the current COVID-19 pandemic among the general public in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6484.

Piasecki, K., & Roszkowska, E. (2019). SS symmetry Simple Additive Weighting Method Equipped with.

Salih, Y. K., Hang See, O., Ibrahim, R. W., Yussof, S., & Iqbal, A. (2015). A novel noncooperative game competing model using generalized simple additive weighting method to perform network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 28(6), 1112–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.2747

Singh, T., Pattnaik, P., Kumar, S. R., Fekete, G., Dogossy, G., & Lendvai, L. (2022). Optimization on physicomechanical and wear properties of wood waste filled poly(lactic acid) biocomposites using integrated entropy-simple additive weighting approach. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 41, 193–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2022.06.008

Sitorus, F., Cilliers, J. J., & Brito-Parada, P. R. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making for the choice problem in mining and mineral processing: Applications and trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 121, 393–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.12.001

Torkayesh, A. E., Deveci, M., Karagoz, S., & Antucheviciene, J. (2023). A state-of-the-art survey of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS): Developments and applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 221(June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119724

Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2021). Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 1229–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156

Wi?ckowski, J., & Sa?abun, W. (2023). Sensitivity analysis approaches in multi-criteria decision analysis: A systematic review. Applied Soft Computing, 148(June), 110915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110915