ac

Decision Support System for the Presidential Election of the Student Executive Board Using the Multi-Factor Evaluation Process Method

Authors

  • Suryani Suryani Universitas Dipa Makassar
  • Annah Annah Dipa Makassar University
  • Nurdiansah Nurdiansah Dipa Makassar University
  • Faizal Faizal Dipa Makassar University
  • Akbar Bahtiar Dipa Makassar University
  • Hardi Hardi Dipa Makassar University

DOI:

10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3480

Keywords:

DSS, MFEP, Weighting System, Evaluation Weight, Student Executive Board

Dimension Badge Record



Abstract

Student Executive Board is a student organization or executive institution found in every tertiary institution and can represent the existence of a tertiary institution. The student Executive Board is headed by the Student Executive Board President, who is assisted by the Secretary-General, three Coordinating Ministers, and several ministries that represent student needs. In carrying out its function as a forum for student aspirations to make changes (agents of change) in paradigm, emotional, intellectual, and religious values, the Student Executive Board requires student candidates who are in synergy with their vision and mission. The Student Executive Board Presidential Election is usually held every year. A decision support system (DSS) was built by implementing the Multi-Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) method to easily and efficiently elect the Student Executive Board President quickly and efficiently. The criteria used are communication skills (C1), leadership attitude (C2), vision and mission (C3), skills (C4), and organizational experience (C5). Each criterion is weighted where the total weight of all criteria equals 1. Next, calculate the evaluation weight value (EW), total evaluation weight (TEW), and ranking. The research results show that alternative 7 (A7), with the highest score of 4.35, is the student candidate with the top ranking, meaning A7 is the most recommended to be elected as President of the Student Executive Board. With this DSS, we can provide appropriate recommendations for Student Executive Board Presidential candidates and assist universities and students in carrying out the selection process quickly and efficiently.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 63 times

References

Afrisawati, A., & Irianto, I. (2019). Pemilihan Bibit Ternak Sapi Potong Melalui Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Metode Mfep. JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi), 6(1), 43–50.

Fazri, I. (2021). Penerapan Metode Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP) Pada Penilaian Kinerja Kolektor Dalam Pengumpulan Dana Kredit Sepeda Motor. Jurnal Sistem Komputer Dan Informatika (JSON), 2(2), 110–114.

Gelu, L. P., Nababan, D., & Kelen, Y. P. K. (2022). E-VOTING PEMILIHAN KETUA BEM UNIVERSITAS TIMOR BERBASIS MOBILE MENGGUNAKAN METODE WATERFALL. Journal of Information and Technology, 2(2), 58–64.

Gunawan, P. W., Firdaus, A., Irmawati, I., Sepriano, S., Arifin, N. Y., Surianto, D. F., Suryani, S., Hermawan, E., & Yanuarsyah, I. (2023). SISTEM PENGAMBIL KEPUTUSAN: Teori dan Studi Kasus dengan Berbagai Metode SPK Populer. PT. Green Pustaka Indonesia.

Hamidani, S., & Etriyanti, E. (2023). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa Dengan Metode Naïve Bayes. JUPITER: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Dan Teknologi Komputer, 15(2), 995–1009.

Hidayah, A. K., & Erwadi, Y. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting. JSAI (Journal Sci. Appl. Informatics), 2(1), 92–96.

Lestari, G., Neneng, N., & Puspaningrum, A. S. (2021). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Tunjangan Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarki Process Pada Pt Mutiara Ferindo Internusa. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Sistem Informasi, 2(3), 38–48.

Megawaty, M., & Ulfa, M. (2020). Decision support system methods: A review. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 2(1), 192–201.

Muzakkir, I. (2017). Penerapan metode topsis untuk sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan keluarga miskin pada desa panca karsa ii. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 9(3), 274–281.

Nasution, A. R. S. (2021). Identifikasi Permasalahan Penelitian. ALACRITY: Journal of Education, 13–19.

Pratama, M. H., Sumijan, S., & Yuhandri, Y. (2024). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah Menggunakan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process. Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI, 10(1), 79–85.

Siburian, T., Dewi, R., & Widodo, W. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Merekomendasikan Tempat Les Musik Dipematangsiantar Menggunakan Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process (Mfep). KOMIK (Konferensi Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer), 2(1).

Sovia, R., & Hadi, A. F. (2019). Membandingkan Metode SAW Dan MFEP Dalam Penentuan Jurusan di Tingkat SLTA. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 3(1), 59–65.

Suarnatha, I. P. D. (2023). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN SELEKSI KETUA BEM MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFILE MATCHING. Journal of Information System Management (JOISM), 4(2), 73–80.

Wahyuni, S., & Niska, D. Y. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Pegawai Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Multifactor Evolution Process (Mfep)(Studi Kasus: Rsup H. Adam Malik Medan). Jurnal Mantik Penusa, 3(2, Des).

Waleng, V. P. J., Juliharta, I. G. P. K., & Fredlina, K. Q. (2023). IMPLEMENTASI E-VOTING PEMILU RAYA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS PRIMAKARA BERBASIS WEB (STUDI KASUS PADA UNIVERSITAS PRIMAKARA). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer, 9(5).

Downloads

ARTICLE Published HISTORY

Submitted Date: 2024-01-20
Accepted Date: 2024-01-21
Published Date: 2024-01-24

How to Cite

Suryani, S., Annah, A., Nurdiansah, N., Faizal, F., Akbar Bahtiar, & Hardi, H. (2024). Decision Support System for the Presidential Election of the Student Executive Board Using the Multi-Factor Evaluation Process Method. Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing, 6(1), 364-370. https://doi.org/10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3480