Comparing Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, and Naïve Bayes Algorhythms for Classifying Banana Types

Abwabul  Jinan; Manutur  Siregar; Vicky  Rolanda; Dede Fika  Suryani; Abdul  Muis

doi:10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3381

Authors

Abwabul Jinan Universitas Satya Terra Bhinneka
Manutur Siregar Universitas Satya Terra Bhinneka
Vicky Rolanda Universitas Satya Terra Bhinneka
Dede Fika Suryani Universitas Sumatra Utara
Abdul Muis universitas satya terra bhinneka

DOI:

10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3381

Keywords:

Banana, Neural Network, SVM algorithm, Naïve Bayes, Classification

Dimension Badge Record

Abstract

One of the most significant fruits for human consumption is the banana. Fruit consumption not only promotes health but also lowers the risk of heart disease, stroke, digestive issues, hypertension, some cancers, cataracts in the eyes, skin ailments, cholesterol reduction, and, perhaps most importantly, boosts immunity.The study included secondary data, which is information gathered from online resources like Kaggle. Ten categories of bananas will be identified from the 531 total varieties of bananas used as a train dataset: Ambon bananas, Stone bananas, Cavendish bananas, Kepok bananas, Mas bananas, Red bananas, plantains, Milk bananas, Horn bananas, and Varigata bananas. The development of information technology for image object recognition has become a very intriguing topic along with the rapid advancement of society, and it is undoubtedly directly tied to information data. In order to examine Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, and Neural Network techniques for classifying banana types, researchers will use the SqueezeNet Deep Learning model to extract features from photos. The study's findings will provide empirical evidence for the distinctions between each algorithm's accuracy, recall, and precision. Based on the collected results, the Neural Network (NN) method is the best in terms of classification, with accuracy of 72.3%, precision of 72.1%, and recall of 72.3%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 113 times

References

Asha Kiranmai, S., and A. Jaya Laxmi. 2018. “Data Mining for Classification of Power Quality Problems Using WEKA and the Effect of Attributes on Classification Accuracy.” Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems 3(1).

Chaugule, Archana, and Suresh N. Mali. 2014. “Evaluation of Texture and Shape Features for Classification of Four Paddy Varieties.” Journal of Engineering (United Kingdom) 2014.

Emanuella, Cecilia Tania, Musfita, and Armin Lawi. 2021. “Klasifikasi Suara Kucing Dan Anjing Menggunakan Convolutional Neural Network.” Konferensi Nasional Ilmu Komputer (KONIK): 321–27.

Gampur, Gordianus et al. “KLASIFIKASI JENIS PISANG MENGGUNAKAN.”

Hadianto, Nur, Hafifah Bella Novitasari, and Ami Rahmawati. 2019. “Klasifikasi Peminjaman Nasabah Bank Menggunakan Metode Neural Network.” Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri 15(2): 163–70.

Hartono, Seno, Anggi Perwitasari, and Herry Sujaini. 2020. “Komparasi Algoritma Nonparametrik Untuk Klasifikasi Citra Wajah Berdasarkan Suku Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN) 6(3): 337.

Hermanto, Hermanto, Ali Mustopa, and Antonius Yadi Kuntoro. 2020. “Algoritma Klasifikasi Naive Bayes Dan Support Vector Machine Dalam Layanan Komplain Mahasiswa.” JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer) 5(2): 211–20.

Ibrahim, Shafaf et al. 2019. “Rice Grain Classification Using Multi-Class Support Vector Machine (SVM).” IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence 8(3): 215–20.

Kusuma, Jaka et al. 2022. “Komparasi Algoritma Support Vector Machine Dan Naive Bayes Pada Klasifikasi Ras Kucing.” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Infrmasi 14(1): 8–12.

Lestari, Zeni Dwi, Nur Nafi’iyah, and Purnomo Hadi Susilo. 2019. “Sistem Klasifikasi Jenis Pisang Berdasarkan Ciri Warna HSV Menggunakan Metode K-NN.” Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi: 11–15.

Mukminin, Amirul, and Dwiza Riana. 2017. “Komparasi Algoritma C4 . 5 , Naïve Bayes Dan Neural Network Untuk Klasifikasi Tanah.” Jurnal Informatika Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika 4(1): 21–31. https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/ji/article/view/1002.

Normah, Bakhtiar Rifai, Satrio Vambudi, and Rifki Maulana. 2022. “Analisa Sentimen Perkembangan Vtuber Dengan Metode Support Vector Machine Berbasis SMOTE.” Jurnal Teknik Komputer AMIK BSI 8(2): 174–80. https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/jtk/article/view/13041/pdf.

Nurajijah, Nurajijah, and Dwiza Riana. 2019. “Algoritma Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Dan SVM Untuk Klasifikasi Persetujuan Pembiayaan Nasabah Koperasi Syariah.” Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Komputer 7(2): 77–82.

Sidhu, Jiwan S., and Tasleem A. Zafar. 2018. “Bioactive Compounds in Banana Fruits and Their Health Benefits.” Food Quality and Safety 2(4): 183–88.

Theodoridis, Theodoros, and Juergen Kraemer. No ????????????????????? ?????????????????Title.

Waliyansyah, Rahmat Robi, and Citra Fitriyah. 2019. “Perbandingan Akurasi Klasifikasi Citra Kayu Jati Menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes Dan K-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN).” Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN) 5(2): 157.

Yana, Yusuf Eka, and Nur Nafi’iyah. 2021. “Klasifikasi Jenis Pisang Berdasarkan Fitur Warna, Tekstur, Bentuk Citra Menggunakan SVM Dan KNN.” RESEARCH?: Journal of Computer, Information System & Technology Management 4(1): 28.