Performance Comparison of the Combination of Smarter-Fuzzy and Smarter-Fuzzy-Topsis Methods on the accuracy of the PPA Scholarship Acceptance Decision Support System

I Komang Tri Edi Wardana; I Made Gede Sunarya; I Gede Aris Gunadi

doi:10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3081

Authors

I Komang Tri Edi Wardana Computer Science Department, Graduate Program, Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia
I Made Gede Sunarya Computer Science Department, Graduate Program, Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia
I Gede Aris Gunadi Computer Science Department, Graduate Program, Ganesha University of Education, Indonesia

DOI:

10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3081

Keywords:

PPA, Smarter, Fuzzy, Topsis

Dimension Badge Record

Abstract

The PPA Scholarship is a scholarship intended for students who excel, are active in campus activities, and are economically disadvantaged in accordance with predetermined conditions. Currently, STAHN MPU Kuturan Singaraja in calculations often takes a long time, causing delays from the predetermined schedule and less accurate results. Based on this, it is necessary to develop a Decision Support System that can provide recommendations for prospective PPA scholarship recipients. There are 6 criteria being used, including: GPA, semester, credits, charter/certificate, assignment letter, and parent's income. In this study, comparing the performance of the combination of the Smarter-Fuzzy and Smarter-Fuzzy-Topsis methods through testing using the confusion matrix method. Smarter method is used to be able to give weighting criteria with ROC technique. The Fuzzy method is used to convert the criteria values ??for each alternative from 0 to 1. The Topsis method is used to rank. The ranking results of the combination Smarter-Fuzzy method show an accuracy rate of 86.6%, and the combination of the Smarter-Fuzzy-Topsis method of 75.5%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 74 times

References

Hilyah Magdalena, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Mahasiswa Lulusan Terbaik Di Perguruan Tinggi (Studi Kasus Stmik Atma Luhur Pangkalpinang),” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun. 2012, vol. 2012, no. Hilyah Magdalena, pp. 1–8, 2012.

S. B. Marbun Murni, Buku Ajar Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode Topsis. CV. Rudang Mayang, 2018.

A. Saleh, “Penerapan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Asisten Laboratorium Komputer,” Masy. Telemat. dan Inf., vol. 8, pp. 1–10, 2018.

Diana, Metode & Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Deepublish, 2018.

Saleh, A. (2018). Penerapan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Rank dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Rekrutmen Asisten Laboratorium Komputer. Masyarakat Telematika Dan Informasi, 8, 1–10.

C. Tohir, “APLIKASI SELEKSI CALON KEPALA SEKOLAH DENGAN METODE SMARTER (Simple Multi –Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks) DAN ORESTE,” JUTEKIN (Jurnal Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 1, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.51530/jutekin.v8i1.463.

Kusmiyanti, Dwi, Suliatun, and Mustakim, “Analisis Sensitifitas Model SMART-AHP dengan SMARTER-ROC sebagai Pengambilan Keputusan Multi Kriteria,” pp. 18–19, 2017.

M. Simanjuntak and A. Fauzi, “Penerapan Fuzzy Mamdani Pada Penilaian Kinerja Dosen (Studi Kasus STMIK Kaputama Binjai),” J. ISD, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 2528–5114, 2017.

Diana. (2018). Metode & Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Deepublish.

Haris, A., Satria, B., & Ukkas, M. I. (2017). Penerapan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemberian Diskon Pada Reseller Dengan Metode Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER). 7(2), 31–37. https://www.upm.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/energy/article/view/211

Nisa, K., Kusrini, & Sudarmawan. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kenaikan Pangkat Karyawan. Jurnal INFORMA Politeknik Indonusa Surakarta, 4(3), 26–31.

Annisa, R., Utami, N., & Sari, E. K. (2020). Kombinasi Metode SMART-TOPSIS dalam Rekomendasi Wilayah Pembangunan Pabrik Kelapa Sawit. 194–200.

Setiawan, R., Arini, A., & Wardhani, L. K. (2020). SMART and TOPSIS Method For Determining The Priority Of Screen Printing. SinkrOn, 4(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v4i2.10471

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.CV