The Housing Recommendation System Uses Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

Nazori Suhandi; Rendra Gustriansyah

doi:10.47709/cnahpc.v5i2.2497

Authors

Nazori Suhandi Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
Rendra Gustriansyah Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

DOI:

10.47709/cnahpc.v5i2.2497

Keywords:

BW, Housing, MCDM, Recommendation System, TOPSIS

Dimension Badge Record

Abstract

Economic and population growth, increasing urbanization, changing habits, new welfare requirements, and lower interest rates have led to increased demand for housing in cities. However, housing conditions in many cities are slightly alarming, while housing is a primary need for the community. Selecting housing for low-income people (LIP) that meets the criteria required by LIP is not an easy task. Because most of the decisions people made did not utilize detailed information. Therefore, a recommendation system for LIP is required. This study aims to develop the housing selection recommendation system for LIP that best suits their wishes. This study integrated two multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the Best Worst (BW) method, which has fewer pairwise comparisons compared to other MCDM methods for selecting criteria and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method for determining housing recommendations for LIP according to their wishes. Based on the analysis results, ten criteria dominate the housing selection for LIP sequentially: Location, Land Size, Down Payment, Public Facilities, Price, Booking Fee, Home Design, House Specifications, House Quality, and Home Ownership Credit. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis results showed that the robustness score of this approach was high. The model could recommend housing for LIP that best suits their wishes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Rendra Gustriansyah, Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-1147

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 231 times

References

Abdel-Baset, M., Chang, V., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2019). An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field. Computers in Industry, 106, 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.017

Abouhashem Abadi, F., Ghasemian Sahebi, I., Arab, A., Alavi, A., & Karachi, H. (2018). Application of best-worst method in evaluation of medical tourism development strategy. Decision Science Letters, 7(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2017.4.002

Akcan, S., & Gülde?, M. (2019). Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study in a Hospital. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2019, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5614892

Askarifar, K., Motaffef, Z., & Aazaami, S. (2018). An investment development framework in Iran’s seashores using TOPSIS and best-worst multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decision Science Letters, 7(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2017.4.004

Aulawi, H., Riansyah, A., & Kurniawati, R. (2020). Analysis of the Selection of Shoe Raw Material Suppliers by Fuzzy Topsis Method. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 15(6), 3983–3990.

Baharin, N. H., Rashidi, N. F., & Mahad, N. F. (2021). Manager selection using Fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1988(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1988/1/012057

Chen, Z., Ming, X., Zhou, T., & Chang, Y. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection for smart supply chain considering internal and external uncertainty: An integrated rough-fuzzy approach. Applied Soft Computing, 87, 106004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.106004

Ghaffari, S., Arab, A., Nafari, J., & Manteghi, M. (2017). Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innovation development based on BWM. Decision Science Letters, 6(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.12.001

Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2017). Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.125

Gustriansyah, R., Ermatita, Rini, D. P., & Malik, R. F. (2020a). Integration of Decision-Making Method and Data-Mining Method as A Preliminary Study of Novel Sales Forecasting Method. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 5730–5735. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/227942020

Gustriansyah, R., Ermatita, Rini, D. P., & Malik, R. F. (2020b). The Criteria That Have A Significant Effect on Forecasting the Number of Sales Using the Best-Worst Method. In 2020 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS) (pp. 236–241). Jakarta: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMCIS51567.2020.9354276

Gustriansyah, R., Sensuse, D. I., & Ramadhan, A. (2015). Decision support system for inventory management in pharmacy using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and sequential pattern analysis approach. In 2015 3rd International Conference on New Media (CONMEDIA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONMEDIA.2015.7449153

Indonesia.Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Kemudahan dan Bantuan Pembiayaan Perumahan bagi Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah (2021). Indonesia: BN 2021 (1492)?: 24 hlm. Retrieved from https://jdih.pu.go.id/internal/assets/assets/produk/PermenPUPR/2021/12/PermenPUPR35.pdf

Khanmohammadi, E., Zandieh, M., & Tayebi, T. (2019). Drawing a Strategy Canvas Using the Fuzzy Best–Worst Method. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 20(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-018-0202-z

Kizielewicz, B., & B?czkiewicz, A. (2021). Comparison of Fuzzy TOPSIS, Fuzzy VIKOR, Fuzzy WASPAS, and Fuzzy MMOORA methods in the housing selection problem. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4578–4591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.236

Komariah Hildayanti, S., Putra, R. R., Suhandi, N., Sanmorino, A., Antony, F., Heryati, A., … Gustriansyah, R. (2018). Enterprise architecture framework selection for higher education using TOPSIS method. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 5327–5330. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.16140

Liang, F., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds. Omega, 96, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102175

Maharani, S., Ridwanto, H., Rahmania Hatta, H., Marisa Khairina, D., & Rivani Ibrahim, M. (2021). Comparison of TOPSIS and MAUT methods for recipient determination home surgery. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 10(4), 930. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v10.i4.pp930-937

Mahsa Oroojeni Mohammad, J., Darvishi, M., & Arash Oroojeni Mohammad, J. (2020). Green supplier selection for the steel industry using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS: A case study of Khouzestan steel company. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100012

Mardison, M., Ramadhanu, A., Rani, L. N., & Enggari, S. (2021). Hybrid DSS for recommendations of halal culinary tourism West Sumatra. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 10(2), 273. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v10.i2.pp273-283

Rakyat, I. K. P. U. dan P. (2022). Temukan Lokasi Perumahan Subsidi Berdasarkan Kriteria. Retrieved December 27, 2022, from https://sikumbang.ppdpp.id

Sadjadi, S. J., & Karimi, M. (2018). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2018.3.003

Salimi, N. (2017). Quality assessment of scientific outputs using the BWM. Scientometrics, 112(1), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2284-3

Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.002

Taherdoost, H., & Brard, A. (2019). Analyzing the Process of Supplier Selection Criteria and Methods. Procedia Manufacturing, 32, 1024–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.317

Wu, Y., Luo, J., & Peng, Y. (2020). An optimization-based framework for housing subsidy policy in China: Theory and practice of housing vouchers. Land Use Policy, 94, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104526

Youssef, A. E. (2020). An Integrated MCDM Approach for Cloud Service Selection Based on TOPSIS and BWM. IEEE Access, 8, 71851–71865. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2987111