Selection of Feature Driven Development (FDD) Model in Agile Method for Developing Information System of Mosque Management

Sasmitoh Rahmad  Riady; Khalis  Sofi; Jafar  Shadiq; Rita Wahyuni  Arifin

doi:10.47709/cnahpc.v4i2.1469

Authors

Sasmitoh Rahmad Riady Universitas Bina Insani, Indonesia
Khalis Sofi Universitas Pelita Bangsa, Indonesia
Jafar Shadiq Universitas Bina Insani, Indonesia
Rita Wahyuni Arifin Universitas Bina Insani, Indonesia

DOI:

10.47709/cnahpc.v4i2.1469

Keywords:

Software Development, Agile Method, Featured Driven Development, Information System, Mosque Management Information System

Dimension Badge Record

Abstract

This paper discusses about software development for building a project using the Feature Driven Development (FDD) model contained in the agile method. As in other agile methods, the Feature Driven Development model has additional properties to implement functions and needs in a short iteration. In terms of the characteristics contained in several other agile models almost all of them have similarities so that makes the stakeholder confusion in determining which model will be chosen as a method of software development. This study focuses on the search for a number of suitable project specifications in the selection of Feature Driven Development models for software development. From the research that has been done on several papers there are several aspects of design and construction in software development by emphasizing the quality and high level of features in developing a software using the Feature Driven Development model. In facilitating the results of the Feature Driven Development model, we will provide a case study of Mosque Management Information System which has several features, such as content management, information of prayer time, online reading Qur’an, and Petty Cash Mosque management. This case is implemented by Feature Driven Development model with short iteration, because this project had done in several months

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Google Scholar Cite Analysis
Abstract viewed = 930 times

References

Albers, A., Stief, P., Dantan, J., Etienne, A., & Siadat, A. (2021). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Agile evelopment?: a a and Agile p p roduct roduct d d evelopment?: a n n a a nalysis nalysis of a cceptance cceptance and a a dded dded v v alue alue May of in in p p ractice ractice A new methodology to analyze the functional and physical architecture of Kaiser product for an assembly oriented family identification. Procedia CIRP, 100, 768–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.046

Alsaqqa, S., Sawalha, S., & Abdel-nabi, H. (2020). Agile Software Development?: Methodologies and Trends Agile Software Development?: Methodologies and Trends. (July). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i11.13269

Cherkaoui, A., Guerss, F., Marzak, A., & Sael, N. (2021). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Smart Irrigation?: case study for Hybrid-SIX methodology Smart Irrigation?: case study for Hybrid-SIX methodology. Procedia Computer Science, 191, 524–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.077

Damodharan, S. (2020). Feature Driven Agile Product Innovation Management Framework. 7, 5–9.

Edison, H., Wang, X., & Conboy, K. (2021). Comparing Methods for Large-Scale Agile Software Development?: A Systematic Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2021.3069039

Leau, Y., Loo, W. K., Tham, W. Y., & Tan, S. F. (2014). Software Development Life Cycle AGILE vs Traditional Approaches. (November).

Merzouk, S., Elhadi, S., Ennaji, H., Marzak, A., & Sael, N. (2017). A Comparative Study of Agile Methods: Towards a New Model-based Method. International Journal of Web Applications, 9(4), 121–128.

Nawaz, Z. (2021). Proposal of Enhanced FDD Process Model. (August). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2021.04.05

Paluch, S., Antons, D., Paluch, S., Antons, D., Brettel, M., Hopp, C., … Wentzel, D. (2019). Stage-gate and agile development in the digital age?: Promises , perils , and boundary conditions Stage-gate and agile development in the digital age?: Promises , perils , and boundary conditions. Journal of Business Research, (March), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.063

Rychlý, M. (2007). A Tool for Supporting Feature-Driven Development.

Saravanan, T. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Software Life Cycle Models. 906–909.

Setyautami, M. R. A., Rubiantoro, R. R., & Azurat, A. (2019). Model-Driven Engineering for Delta-Oriented Software Product Lines. 2019 26th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC48747.2019.00057

Šimí?ková, J., Buganová, K., & Mošková, E. (2021). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Specifics of the Agile Approach and Methods in Project Specifics of the Agile Approach and Methods in Project Management and its Use in Transport Management and its Use in Transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 55, 1436–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.07.130

Sofi, K., Sunge, A. S., & Riady, S. R. (2020). The Implementation of Cost Control System Based on Website in PPIC Department. 1(2), 69–80.

Tashtoush, Y. M., Darweesh, D. A., Husari, G., Darwish, O. A., Darwish, Y., Issa, L. B., & Ashqar, H. I. (2022). Agile Approaches for Cybersecurity Systems , IoT and Intelligent Transportation. IEEE Access, 10, 1360–1375. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3136861

Yakovyna, V., & Symets, I. (2020). The Relation between Software Development Methodologies and Factors Affecting Software Reliability. 23–26.