Decision Support System Budget Allocation Fund Village With AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) In the village of

- The budget allocation of a village fund is very important and take big effect to village progress Because the office to distribute the tax result for village development. But, that allocation is not accurately. Therefore there was design a system to support a decision a budget allocation of village funds by using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This research done to the make-easy an office village in budgeting is the allocation of village funds. An method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of a method known as important as the highest level. An AHP method is look for the best alternative. So,


Introduction
Developments in information technology and information systems are so central in today's era of making almost all aspects of life can not be spared from the use of a common computer device komputer.Penggunaan is the use of computers in an enterprise where one of the sources of information in the most influential organization of its existence.
The budget allocation of the Village Fund (ADD) financial budget given by government to the village, the which is where the source of taste of various local taxes and financial fund perimbanganpusat and regions received by the District. Minister in accordance with regulations in the State No. 37 of 2007 on the guidelines pengelolahan finance village in Article 18 states that, "The allocation of funds the village comes from the budget of the District / Municipal sourced from funds perimbanganpusat financial and Regions received by District / City sourced from the fund balance of the financial center and area received by District / City to the Village at least 10% (ten percent) ". Implementation of the Village Fund Allocation (ADD) in the village is intended to support and fund programs in the village of Desa penyelanggaran and implementation activities, community development and empowerment berdasarakan meeting results in leveling tersebutuntuk village building the village.
The village head is still doing the allocation of budgetary funds by consensus to the community village and hamlet head so it takes quite a long time, and keakurat the data is still lacking. This causes the amount of funds Obtained yangdapat still inaccurate and still manually.
b. Determining the priority elements c. synthesis d. measuring consistency e. Calculate Consistency index (Ci) with the formula: = ( − )/ Where n = number of elements f. Calculate the ratio of consistency / Consistency Ratio (RI) with the formula: = / Checking konsistensi.Jika value is more than 10%, then the judgment must be corrected assessment data. But if consistency (CI / CR) is less than or equal to 0.1, then the calculation must be stated Correctly.

A. problem analysis
Budget allocation decision support system of the Village Fund With AHP method (Analytic Hierarchy Process) In the village of Hierarcy Sialang.Analytical Process (AHP) is one method of decision support system that is unique Compared to others. This is Because The weighting of the criteria, the weighting of each criterion is not determined in advance but is determined using a formula of this method is based on priority (level of importance) are sourced from nature perceptional tabel.Metode a method, the which means that the importance of an alternative criterion depends viewpoint or perspective in judging someone.

B. Discussion
The steps in this method are as follows: a) Defining the problem danmenetukan desired solution.
In Determining the allocation of the village, it can be broken down into elements Several items, namely the criteria and alternatives. As for the criteria in Determining the allocation of the village are: -Area The One element penitng Clearly more absolute than any other element. 9 One absolutely essential element of the other elements.  information:  Row 2 column 2, Total Area -Total Area value ratio of 1 means the two elements are equally important.  Row 2 column 3, Total Area -Needs Peoples, comparison = 1/5 0:20, the mean area element Area is more important than the needs of the people element.  Row 2 column 4, Total Area -Works communities ratio = 1 / 30.33, Total Area means the element slightly less important than job element Peoples ,.  Row 2 column 5, Total Area -Type Development ratio = 1 / 50.20, Total Area means the element is not more important than the element type Development  Row 2 column 6, Total Area -Total Population ratio = 1 / 30.33, Total Area means the elements a little more important than the element of Population. After normalization value comparison is completed then the sum of comparison values each -each column, to a two column Total Area: 1 + 5 + 3 + 5 + 3 = 17, and for the column three Community Needs:1 + 0.33 + 0.20 + 5 + 3 = 9.53, and for the four columns of Public Works: 0.33 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 5 = 11.33, and for the five columns Building type: 0, 33 + 0.33 + 0.20 + 0.33 + 1 = 4.90, and for the six columns Population: 0.33 + 0.33 + 0.20 + 0.33 + 1 = 2.20, could seen from Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.    After It is also calculated in accordance priority sub-criteria such as the above steps are. Adapaun step sub priority criteria, the following criteria: e) Calculating Priority Criteria Sub Criteria From Total Area  Make a Comparison matrix information:  Row 2 column 2, desperately needs -desperately need one comparison value, means that the two elements are equally important.  Row 2 column 3, desperately needs -requires a comparison value 3, meaning elements in desperate need of a little more important than the element of need.
 Row 2 column 4, is in desperate need -just needs a value ratio of 5 means very requires more important element of the element requires. After normalization value comparison is completed then the sum value of the comparison in each column to column two Very Requires:1+0:33+ 0:20 = 1.53, and for three columns Requires: 3 + 1 + 0.33 = 4.33, and for four columns, please Requires: 5 + 3 + 1 = 9, can be seen in table 4.7 comparative matrix area.  Troubled Comparison calculate Total Area    Table 4.9 eigenvectors niali area. information:  Row 2 column 2, desperately needs -desperately need one comparison value, means that the two elements are equally important.  Row 2 column 3, urgently need -requires value ratio of 5 means very requires more important element of the element requires.  Row 2 column 4, is in desperate need -just requires a ratio of 7 means the element is in dire need Clearly absolutely essential element in need.

f) Calculating Priority Sub Criteria Community Needs  Creating a Community Needs Comparison Matrix
After normalization value comparison is completed then the sum of comparison values each -each column to column two desperately need: 1+0:20+ 0:14 = 1.34, and for the three columns need:5 + 1 + 0.33 = 6.33, and for the four columns requires enough: 7 + 3 + 1 = 11, can be seen from the table comparison matrix 4:10 society needs.  Make Comparison Troubled Community Needs    Table 10 niali eigenvectors community needs. g) Calculating Priority Sub Criteria Of Public Works  Make a Comparison Matrix information:  Row 2 column 2, desperately needs -desperately need one comparison value, means that the two elements are equally important.  Row 2 column 3, urgently need -requires value ratio of 2, it means that the element is in dire need a little more important than the element requires  Row 2 column 4, is in desperate need -just needs a value ratio of 5 means very requires more important element of the element requires. After normalization value comparison is completed then the sum of comparison values each -each column to column two desperately need: 1+0:05+ 0:02 = 1.7, and for the three columns need:2 + 1 + 0.25 = 3.25, and untukkolom four reasonably require: 5 + 4 + 1 = 10, can be seen from the     information:  Row 2 column 2, desperately needs -desperately need one comparison value, means that the two elements are equally important.  Row 2 column 3, desperately needs -requires a comparison value 3, meaning elements in desperate need of a little more important than the element of need.  Row 2 column 4, is in desperate need -just needs a value ratio of 5 means very requires more important element of the element requires.
After normalization value comparison is completed then the sum of comparison values each -each column to column two desperately need: 1 +0:33+ 0:20 = 1.53, and for the three columns need:3 + 1 + 0.33 = 4.33, and for the four columns requires enough: 5 + 3 + 1 = 9.00, can be seen from the   information:  Row 2 column 2, desperately needs -desperately need one comparison value, means that the two elements are equally important.  Row 2 column 3, desperately needs -requires a comparison value 3, meaning elements in desperate need of a little more important than the element of need.  Row 2 column 4, is in desperate need -just needs a value ratio of 5 means very requires more important element of the element requires. After normalization value comparison is completed then the sum of comparison values each -each column to column two desperately need: 1+0:33+ 0:20 = 1.53, and for the three columns need:3 + 1 + 0.33 = 4.33, and for the four columns requires enough: 5 + 3 + 1 = 9.00, can be seen from the      Table 4:22 niali eigenvectors population.

Conclusion
Based on the discussion of the research, it was concluded as follows: a) This system aims to assist in decision making for the allocation of budget funds a good village to expedite work at the village office. b) In this calculation method research Analytucal Hierarchy Process(AHP). c) Based on calculations of the data allocation of budgetary funds, the which received the most important village is the hamlet IV with the most important value = 0.61 Eligible.